Refund the amount deposited by the applicant pursuant to the ...

High Court Orders IFCI to Refund Rs. 57.50 Lacs Plus 18% Interest Due to Insufficient Documentation of Applicant's Funds.

May 9, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law HC

Refund the amount deposited by the applicant pursuant to the directions/ order of the DRT, Delhi - The High court observes that IFCI failed to demonstrate that the amount deposited by the applicant was remitted to the Official Liquidator. Despite repeated opportunities, IFCI did not provide a satisfactory breakdown of the amounts deposited with the Official Liquidator, leading to uncertainty regarding the inclusion of the applicant's funds. - Given the failure of IFCI to account for the applicant's funds and provide satisfactory documentation, the court directs IFCI to refund the amount of Rs. 57.50 Lacs to the applicant, along with interest at 18% per annum from the date of deposit.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund the amount deposited by the applicant pursuant to the ...

High Court Orders IFCI to Refund Rs. 57.50 Lacs Plus 18% Interest Due to Insufficient Documentation of Applicant's Funds.

May 9, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law HC

You may also like:

Contravention of sections 18(2) and 18(3) read with section 64(2) of FERA, 1973 established. Company failed to recover export dues without RBI permission or extension....

The court held that the assessee was entitled to refund of Rs. 3,50,00,000/- deposited with the department, along with statutory interest and interest on refunds. The...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that surcharge is not leviable when the total income is less than Rs. 50 lacs. The Assessing Officer had contended that...

This order u/s 119(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 specifies the monetary limits for income-tax authorities to exercise their powers of reduction or waiver of interest...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Disallowance of claim of deduction @ 50% u/s 57(iv) - interest received on enhanced compensation - on the basis of the overriding provision of Section 56(2)(viii) read...

Non-payment of interest on refund u/s 18(4) of the Customs Act 1962 upon finalization of provisional assessment was challenged. Upon completion of the specified import...

SC modified honorarium structure for High-Powered Sale Committee (HPSC) members due to infrequent meetings creating compensation disparity. Initially, Member Secretary...

The assessee filed a return manually admitting income u/s 44AE from running lorries and agricultural income. The Tribunal held that when income is offered on a...

Entitlement for interest on refund - finalizing the assessment after delay of 8 years - The appellant is entitled to interest if the refund is payable after the expiry...

Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs....

The High Court held that the Revenue's decision to adjust the refund due to the petitioner for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2017-18 against the stayed demand for the...

Stay of recovery of demand - Tribunal has granted partial relief staying 50% of tax liabilaity as determined by AO - Total demand is Rs. 2,57,57,53,13 - further relief denied - HC

Income From other sources - The Appellate Tribunal addressed the disallowance of interest expenses u/s 57(iii) of the Act. The claim was denied due to lack of direct...

Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

Quick Updates: