The HC ruled that when a taxpayer produces tax invoices and ...

Minor Typographical Errors in Tax Invoices and E-way Bills Don't Justify Harsh Penalties Under CGST Act Section 129(1)(b)

March 12, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

The HC ruled that when a taxpayer produces tax invoices and e-way bills with minor typographical errors (such as incorrect vehicle number HR-46C-4623 instead of HR-58C-4623), goods should be released under Section 129(1)(a) rather than 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act. Following precedent established in Halder Enterprises v. State of U.P. & others and the circular dated 31.12.2018, the Court held that when documents establish ownership despite minor errors, penalties under Section 129(1)(b) are inappropriate. The authorities were directed to expedite the release of goods under Section 129(1)(a). Petition allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC ruled that when a taxpayer produces tax invoices and ...

Minor Typographical Errors in Tax Invoices and E-way Bills Don't Justify Harsh Penalties Under CGST Act Section 129(1)(b)

March 12, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Petitioner challenged order passed u/s 129(3) of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion due to typographical error in date on E-way Bill and Tax...

Levy of penalty - vehicle number in Part-B of the e-way bill was incorrect - minor typographical error - Typically when the error is a minor error of the nature found in...

Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of...

The Public Notice issued by the Office of Principal Commissioner of Customs addresses the issue of IGST refunds on exports that remain unprocessed due to SB005 error,...

Minor error in e-way bill relating to vehicle number, goods detained citing invalid e-way bill. HC held detention unjustified as circular permits imposing penalty of Rs....

Invocation of proceedings u/s 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act - vehicle number was written wrong in E-way Bill and rightly on invoice issued by the appellant - the mistake of...

Levy of penalty - document/invoice number has wrongly been mentioned in the e-way bill - no intent to evade tax - The court concludes that the penalty imposition in this...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Detention of goods u/s 129(1) of CGST Act - Invoice number mentioned in Tax invoice not tallied with E-way bill - it is very much clear that the action of the...

Expired e-way bill - Levy of penalty - the discrepancy pointed out is only on the date of invoice which is shown as 03.02.2021 while that shown in the e-way bill was...

HC held that mentioning SAP document number instead of tax invoice number in e-way bill during transport from Mathura to Mirzapur was a genuine human error. Physical...

The case involved the determination of penalty u/s 69(1)(k) of the J&K Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the issuance of 35 improper invoices on the same day. The High Court...

Quick Updates: