Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2020 Year 2020 This

Invocation of proceedings u/s 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act - ...


Refund Ordered for GST and Penalty Due to Typo in E-way Bill Vehicle Number u/s 129 of CGST/HPGST Act.

March 19, 2020

Case Laws     GST     Commissioner

Invocation of proceedings u/s 129 of the CGST/HPGST Act - vehicle number was written wrong in E-way Bill and rightly on invoice issued by the appellant - the mistake of two digits while entering vehicle no. in invoice and E-way Bill is a typographic error and may be treated as a minor one. - Amount of GST with penalty as deposited to be refunded - Commissioner

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Expired e-way Bill - Levy of penalty - Seizure of goods alongwith the vehicle - The tax/penalty under section 129 of CGST/HPGST Act 2017 cannot be imposed merely on the...

  2. The High Court ruled on a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 129 of the GST Act due to an error in mentioning the vehicle number in the E-way bill during the transit...

  3. Levy of penalty for discrepancy in E-way Bill - E-way bills generated without completely filling Part B - The object of circular dated 14.09.2018 was that in case of...

  4. Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST...

  5. Procedural irregularities without fraudulent intent do not warrant harsh penalties u/s 129 of GST enactments. HC quashed impugned order due to procedural nature of...

  6. Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State E-way Bill was challenged. The Court held that at the time of interception, the Central E-way Bill under GST...

  7. The High Court reviewed the validity of the show cause notice (SCN) and assessment order u/s 129 of the CGST Act. The issue centered on penalty imposition due to...

  8. The Rajasthan High Court considered a case involving the detention of goods due to an expired e-way bill, raising concerns about tax evasion. Citing a judgment from the...

  9. Challenge to penalty order u/s 129(1) of CGST Act for non-generation of Part-B of E-way bill. Petitioner accepted notice and paid Rs. 11,08,150 penalty voluntarily...

  10. Time Limitation - issuing a notice after the detention - The High Court noted that the actions of the tax authority did not align with the prescribed timeline outlined...

  11. Levy of penalty under Section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act - jurisdiction to detain goods and vehicle - allegation is that the vehicles carried consignments under 'Bill to...

  12. Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - demand based on mere presumptions - the proceedings has been initiated solely on the basis of...

  14. Non-generation of e-way bill during transportation of goods led to seizure order u/s 129(3) of GST Act, imposing penalty and interest. However, it was admitted that...

  15. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates