Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT Surat dealt with a case involving unexplained credit ...


ITAT restricted addition u/s 68 to 0.75% of transaction value due to lack of details, setting a consistent view based on previous cases.

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 23, 2024

The ITAT Surat dealt with a case involving unexplained credit u/s 68. The assessee received a commission of 0.50% per Rs. 100 but failed to provide details of transactions or persons involved. The Tribunal noted the absence of specific details and the peculiar nature of the business. Previous cases were cited where additions were restricted to 0.125% to 0.35%. Following a consistent approach, the Tribunal limited the addition to Rs. 75 per lakh, equivalent to 0.75% for Rs. 100. The total credit in the bank account was found to be Rs. 2.07 crores after considering cheque and cash deposits. The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the assessing officer to adjust the assessment accordingly.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT considered TP Adjustment in the context of international transactions involving purchase of solar goods/lights and reimbursement of expenses and warranty costs....

  2. Bogus shareholders – when full details known to department, no additions be made u/s 68 - HC

  3. The ITAT addressed multiple issues related to the assessee's eligibility for deduction u/s 80IA and various additions made by the AO. The AO's assessment u/s 153A...

  4. Transaction value - Valuation (Customs) - Special or abnormal discount to the related buyers which were in excess of 3% discount - The Appellate Tribunal observed that...

  5. Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - bank account can’t be loosely called as books of account u/s 68 - ITAT can’t covert the addition from section 68 to section...

  6. The ITAT Mumbai addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 regarding penny stock transactions. The genuineness of share transactions was questioned, with the assessee...

  7. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  8. Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - Addition as income of brokerage/commission @ 2% of cash deposits as accommodation entry provider - onus to prove - The High Court concluded that the...

  10. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained loan - Neither any written contract nor any identity of the Creditor, having been established in the present case, we cannot find any fault...

  11. Rejection of transaction value declared by appellant was improper as it lacked cogent and comparable evidence from contemporaneous imports. Adjudicating authority failed...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  13. Misdeclaration in the quantity of goods imported - enhancement of the value - Transaction value - demand of duty - The tribunal noted the discrepancy in quantity but...

  14. Addition u/s 68 - The CIT(A) has observed that the transactions was part of the turnover/sale, whereas the addition has been made under Section 68 of the Act without...

  15. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates