The ITAT Kolkata ruled on the validity of an assessment order ...

ITAT Kolkata held that no valid notice u/s 148 was issued by jurisdictional AO for reassessment. Reassessment proceedings deemed illegal.

May 24, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT Kolkata ruled on the validity of an assessment order u/s 147. The jurisdictional AO did not issue a valid notice u/s 148. The assessee argued that the ACIT lacked jurisdiction and a fresh notice should have been issued by the correct authority. Since no such notice was issued, the assessment proceedings were deemed illegal and void ab initio. The ITAT held that without a valid notice u/s 148, the reassessment proceedings were bad in law and quashed them, deleting the additions made. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Kolkata ruled on the validity of an assessment order ...

ITAT Kolkata held that no valid notice u/s 148 was issued by jurisdictional AO for reassessment. Reassessment proceedings deemed illegal.

May 24, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice under section 148 has been issued by a non jurisdictional AO - It is settled principle of law that when the notice under section...

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

Faceless assessment scheme - jurisdictional issue regarding Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) issuing notice u/s 148 for reassessment. Principal authority's power...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Initiation of reassessment proceedings, u/s.148 of the Act and issued notice to the assessee was based on valid reason on the strength...

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

The High Court held that for a valid reassessment notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue must comply with Section 151A, which mandates the issuance of such...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a re-assessment notice issued by the jurisdictional AO instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) as...

Reassessment proceedings initiated against a deceased person are void, as issuing notice in the name of a deceased individual is a fundamental jurisdictional error, not...

Issue of faceless assessment of income escaping assessment, where the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Reassessment u/s 147 - fictitious F&O loss by manipulative client code modification - return was originally processed u/s 143(1) and notice u/s 148 was issued within...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - mandation to issue notice u/s 148 - The reassessment proceedings can only commence once notice under Section 148 of the Act...

Reopening of assessment - AO was not aware about the death of the assessee at the relevant time when he issued notice under section 148 of the Act. Therefore, notice...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

Quick Updates: