Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for ...

Reassessment Quashed: Section 147 Invalid Due to Unauthorized Notice u/s 148(1) by Non-Jurisdictional Officer.

June 18, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the impugned notice u/s 148(1) has been issued by the ITO, Ward 2(2), Jamnagar who had no jurisdiction over the petitioner, and hence, such notice was bad on the account of having been issued by an officer who had not authority in law to issue such notice - notice and reassessment quashed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for ...

Reassessment Quashed: Section 147 Invalid Due to Unauthorized Notice u/s 148(1) by Non-Jurisdictional Officer.

June 18, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Validity of reopening of assessment - scope of old unamended law and new inserted section 148A - The High court held that notices issued under the newly inserted Section...

Notice issued u/s 148 beyond the limitation period prescribed under erstwhile provisions of section 149(1)(b) is barred by limitation, even after considering the...

CIT(A) erred by assuming reassessment proceedings initiated by AO u/s 148A were valid, ignoring merits of earlier assessment orders dated 31.03.2022 passed pursuant to...

Notice u/s 148 issued to a non-existent entity due to merger. ITAT held such notice illegal, invalid and non-est as per Bombay HC in Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. Despite...

The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Reassessment u/s 147 - notices u/s 133(6), 147/148, 142(1)/143(2) and Assessment Order were never validly served on the assessee due to change in address - assessment...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

The High Court held that the impugned notice issued u/s 148 of the Act was beyond the time limitation prescribed u/s 149(1). The Revenue's contention that the...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

Quick Updates: