The case involved a dispute regarding the adjustment of an ...

Refund claim set-off against tax dues during CIRP period found violative of IBC moratorium. IT Department ordered to refund Rs. 90 lakhs.

May 28, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

The case involved a dispute regarding the adjustment of an income tax refund with outstanding liability after the CIRP timeline had expired and a liquidation order was passed. The Appellate Tribunal held that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC continues even after the CIRP period ends, and creditors cannot exercise set-off during this period. The Respondent was found liable to refund the amount set off against tax dues as it violated the moratorium. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to refund the adjusted amount to the Corporate Debtor within two weeks. The judgment emphasized that set-off during CIRP is against IBC principles.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a dispute regarding the adjustment of an ...

Refund claim set-off against tax dues during CIRP period found violative of IBC moratorium. IT Department ordered to refund Rs. 90 lakhs.

May 28, 2024

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy AT

You may also like:

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the NCLT order, ruling that u/s 14 of the IBC, 2016, a security deposit lying with a third party cannot be adjusted against...

The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax...

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the first petitioner-company, and a moratorium...

CIRP - Home Buyers - Moratorium against the company has been ordered - The Supreme Court's decision in this case clarifies that the moratorium u/s 14 of IBC does not...

Refund claim - Period of limitation - For the FY 2009- 10 being filed now - The entire problem could be resolved if the department avails of the provision under Section...

CIRP in progress - moratorium in effect - recovery of dues from NPA - It is claimed that since the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC has ceased to subsist after the...

Refund claim - Period of limitation - Double Taxation - The respondent had also paid tax on the same invoices. - The petitioner sought direction for the refund of Input...

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) accrued under the Value Added Tax (VAT) regime upon transition to the Goods and Services...

Initiation of CIRP - Claim beyond the period of limitation - The Adjudicating Authority, exercising powers under Section 7 or Section 9 of IBC, is not a Debt Collection...

The creditors of the Personal Guarantors who are unable to file an application due to enforcement of moratorium under Section 96 can very well avail the benefit of...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

The assessee failed to claim the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit in the original income tax return and did not file a revised return. The Assessing Officer (AO) did...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

Set off of brought forward business loss - mistakes in previous years for not claiming benefit of set-off - 8 years time limit provided in the statute - The ITAT found...

Quick Updates: