CESTAT Bangalore held that show-cause notices invoking extended ...

Demand of customs duty for destroyed capital goods. No suppression of facts found. Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked.

Case Laws Customs

May 29, 2024

CESTAT Bangalore held that show-cause notices invoking extended period u/s 28(1)/(4) of Customs Act were not valid as appellant had informed authorities about capital goods destruction and obtained necessary permissions for de-bonding. Commissioner (A) dropped penalty u/s 114A due to continuous correspondence with no suppression of facts. Order-in-Appeal upheld demand u/s 72(1) based on B17 bond, not sustainable beyond show-cause notice. Decision referenced CCE vs. Gas Authority of India Ltd. to set aside impugned orders and allow appeals.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT Bangalore held that show-cause notices invoking extended ...

Demand of customs duty for destroyed capital goods. No suppression of facts found. Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked.

Case Laws Customs

May 29, 2024

You may also like:

Demand of customs duty invoking extended period of limitation - the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided all relevant information and documents at the time of...

Central excise duty exemption notification dated 01.03.2002 was denied, leading to recovery of duty, interest, and penalty. The extended period of limitation was invoked....

The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), imported goods and stored them in a licensed warehouse u/s 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. These goods were destroyed in a...

Extended Period of limitation u/s 28 - Demand duty - confiscation - penalty - ab initio cancellation of the scrip - Forged Shipping Bills - The CESTAT held that the...

100% EOU - demand of customs duty on the raw material imported duty free - removal of finished goods in DTA without having any permission from the Development...

The case involves a dispute u/s Customs Act regarding remission of duty for goods lost in a fire in an SEZ. The tribunal held that loss of goods in fire does not...

100% EOU - Demand of customs duty on goods that were imported but remained undelivered, by rejecting the request of the appellant for remission of the duty - Nothing was...

Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

Misdeclaration of goods regarding value and quantity - goods declared as 'unbranded', but branded caps of various brands like Puma, Nike, Adidas etc. found -...

Duty demand - collection excess duty from customers on sale of import goods - duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act cannot be demanded on imported custom...

Penalty - Suppression of facts or not - Extend period of limitation - Service tax paid on Reverse Charge Mechanism and credit was availed even after issuance of SCN -...

Extended period of limitation - The very fact that the appellant is contesting the issue of invoking larger period of limitation, that the rendering of service under the...

Extended period of limitation - Demand of differential duty alongwith ineterst and penalty - The Assessing Officer would have checked and asked for the RSP of the motor...

100% EOU - Import of textile machinery without payment of duty - Failure to install the capital goods within stipulated time - since the impugned goods have been...

Extended period of Limitation - suppression of facts or not - The Tribunal observes that the dispute revolves around the classification of taxable services, which...

Quick Updates: