The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for ...

Unexplained cash investment for property purchase. Addition without cross-examination deemed unjustified. Burden on AO to prove.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 30, 2024

The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for ...

Unexplained cash investment for property purchase. Addition without cross-examination deemed unjustified. Burden on AO to prove.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 30, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Addition u/s.69 or 68 - assessee has paid on-money towards purchase of property to the seller - The assessee is only owner of 1/3rd share in the property purchased. -...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

Addition u/s 69A - cash balance on account of withdrawal from different bank accounts - The mere fact of holding cash for a longer period was not a sufficient ground for...

Addition of unexplained investments u/s 69B - alleged cash payment for purchase of land - alleged purchase value noted in the diary found in search - it does not contain...

The assessee made investments in two firms by purchasing cold storage units funded by M/s. A.R. Constructions, where the assessee is a managing partner. The source for...

The ITAT Jodhpur ruled on additions made based on cash received for termination of a property purchase agreement and business expenses related to disputed agreements....

The case pertains to an unexplained investment u/s 69B, where an addition was made on account of cash payment for the purchase of land. The Assessing Officer relied on a...

Addition on account of unexplained money u/s 69A - unaccounted cash - When the cash is found with an assessee, it is the duty of the assessee to prove the source of such...

Unexplained investment/unexplained cash credit under section 68 & 69 - no addition is called for on account of baseless allegation of unexplained investment by the...

Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular...

Disallowance based on third party information about unexplained purchases was challenged. ITAT held that the additions were unsustainable as the disallowance was solely...

Addition being 40% of cash balance shown in the balance sheet as income of the assessee - A.O without any basis, simply says that the cash in hand is excessive and...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

Quick Updates: