Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The case involved a refund claim u/s 129A of the Customs Act, ...


Refund claim for imported goods rejected by CESTAT. Assessee failed to refer matter to Chief Commissioner of Customs. Appeal dismissed.

Case Laws     Customs

June 7, 2024

The case involved a refund claim u/s 129A of the Customs Act, 1962 before CESTAT. The issue was regarding duty paid on re-importation of 'Ductile Iron Casting Manhole Covers, Frames & Grates' rejected by foreign customers. Assessee claimed refund citing improper assessment under N/N. 94/96-CUS and sought benefit of N/N. 158/95-CUS. The Majority decision held that the appeal was not maintainable as the matter was not referred to the Chief Commissioner of Customs as required by proviso to Section 129A. Consequently, the revenue appeal was dismissed by CESTAT.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Refund of the Additional Duty of Customs (SAD) - rejection of refund on the ground that the description of the imported goods and the goods sold in India does not tally...

  2. Refund of SAD - rejection on the ground of time limitation - If importer imported goods in March, 2020, after lockdown due to the Pandemic Covid 19 in all over country,...

  3. Refund claim - duty paid at the time of import - Assesse filed a Refund Claim on the ground that the imported goods were exempt from payment of Additional Customs Duty -...

  4. Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of...

  5. Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

  6. Adjustment of refund claim (rebate claim on export of goods) with demand stayed by the CESTAT

  7. Denial of refund claim - Pre mature refund claim - appellants are at liberty to file the refund claim even though the matter is still pending before the Apex Court - AT

  8. 100% EOU - de-bonding - refund of the excise duty previously paid - Admittedly, such duty was paid at the time of what is referred to de-bonding. However, this would not...

  9. Valuation of imported goods - NIDB data cannot be used to enhance the value of imported goods.

  10. Refund of service tax - Unjust enrichment - Period of limitation - Tax paid on self assessment basis - Claim of refund without challenging the assessment, to claim the...

  11. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  12. Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

  13. Confiscation of the imported goods - used hand tools - "Capital Goods" or not as per para-9.12 of Foreign Trade Policy - appellant did not have licence to import such...

  14. Refund - The refund claims were declined only on one ground, without challenging the determination of annual capacity of production, the processor could not have...

  15. Classification of goods imported - whether the goods imported are calcareous stone ‘other than marble’ which could be allowed to be imported only against SIL during the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates