The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision ...

Revision u/s 263: AO's order erroneous & prejudicial to revenue. Lack of enquiry on provisions claim. PCIT decision upheld.

June 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the allowability of provisions claimed by the assessee. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) found the Assessing Officer's (AO) order to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to lack of inquiry on the AO's part. The Tribunal noted that the AO did not apply his mind to the issues raised, rendering the assessment order flawed. The Tribunal upheld the PCIT's decision, emphasizing the importance of proper inquiry by the AO. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals concerning capital expenditure on LAN network and electrical expenses, directing the AO to verify if the disallowance was made by the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision ...

Revision u/s 263: AO's order erroneous & prejudicial to revenue. Lack of enquiry on provisions claim. PCIT decision upheld.

June 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee claimed exemption from long-term capital gains tax on the sale of agricultural land situated beyond the prescribed distance from municipal limits. The...

Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposit during the demonization period - The tribunal noted that the AO had conducted an adequate inquiry into the assessee's cash...

Revision u/s 263 - merely because the ld. PCIT does not agree with the order of the AO cannot make the order erroneous as long as the same was passed after all possible...

Revision u/s 263 - The ITAT observed that there was no evidence of lack of enquiry by the Assessing Officer regarding the claim of deduction under Section 57. The case...

Revision u/s 263 - In terms of Section 263 of the Act, the PCIT is empowered to invoke the power if, in his opinion, the assessment order is erroneous in so far as it is...

The High Court held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) lacked jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act in this case. The Assessing...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

Revision u/s 263 - receipt of on-money - incriminating material found in search or not? - PCIT should himself have conducted the enquiry or causing to make such...

Invocation of Section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (PCIT), alleging non-application of mind and lack of jurisdiction. The key points are: The...

Revision u/s 263 regarding claim of accommodation entry - reliance on statements of third parties. Timelines for completing assessment u/s 143(3). Assessing officer duly...

Revision u/s 263 - revenue failed to bring on record that the order passed by the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue - This is a case of...

Quick Updates: