The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the ...

Assessing Officer's order not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. Allegation of Lack of inquiry by LD PCIT fails. Order quashed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2024

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the main allegation was the non-disclosure of agricultural income affecting the deduction u/s 54B. The tribunal clarified that an AO's order can be considered erroneous if based on incorrect fact, law, or lacks investigation. The phrase "prejudicial to the interest of the revenue" must align with an erroneous order. Loss due to a lawful decision or a difference in opinion isn't necessarily prejudicial. In this case, the AO's assessment was meticulous and lawful, not prejudicing revenue. The PCIT's critique lacked inquiry and was deemed erroneous and prejudicial. The AO's detailed investigation and lawful order led to the quashing of the PCIT's revision. The appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT addressed a case involving revision u/s 263 where the ...

Assessing Officer's order not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. Allegation of Lack of inquiry by LD PCIT fails. Order quashed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2024

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing...

Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - A reading of the same clearly shows that after having made a contradictory observation on issue of lack of enquiry of cash deposit aspect for...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The order passed by the ld. Assessing Officer while completing the reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w. section 147, neither suggests that any such...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Pr.CIT has ignored the replies of the assessee and he has not discussed as to why he does not agree with the contentions of the assessee. The...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld. PCIT had alleged that the ld. AO had not made any enquiry at all on the issue of long term borrowings and other current liabilities. It is not...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

The ITAT dealt with a case involving a Revision u/s 263. The PCIT alleged that the AO did not inquire into cash deposits during demonetization or non-disclosure of...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT is incorrect in coming to the conclusion that Assessing Officer has not examined the issue and applied his mind insofar as investments in fixed...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained cash deposit received from various persons - Once the Assessing Officer has taken a view based on the explanation as well as...

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - an order which is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - As far as adequacy of inquiry is considered, there is no law which provides the...

The ITAT upheld the Revision u/s 263 by PCIT, finding the AO's assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue. The unsigned assessment...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the allowability of provisions claimed by the assessee. The Principal Commissioner of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Quick Updates: