The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the ...

Mismatch between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 1 statement: Court finds lack of fair chance to contest. Order set aside for reevaluation.

Case Laws GST

June 8, 2024

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair chance to contest a tax demand due to a mismatch between GSTR 3B return and GSTR 1 statement. The tax liability arose from this discrepancy. The petitioner's counsel provided evidence of GST computation errors. The court noted the tax proposal was confirmed due to lack of response to show cause notice. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner can reply to the notice within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the ...

Mismatch between the GSTR 3B return and the GSTR 1 statement: Court finds lack of fair chance to contest. Order set aside for reevaluation.

Case Laws GST

June 8, 2024

You may also like:

The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

Disallowance of ITC - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR- 2A - Rectification of GSTR-1 return - The Bombay High Court, considering the circumstances and precedent,...

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

Sanction of pending IGST refund claims where the records have not been transmitted to ICEGATE due to GSTR-1 and GSTR- 3B mismatch error - Circular

Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

Service of SCN - discrepancies pertaining to difference in turn over between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B, difference between GSTR 3B Vs GSTR 2A - input mismatch - This Court to...

The court set aside the impugned order passed by the respondent u/s 73 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017, imposing a liability of Rs. 10.72 lakhs towards...

Time limit for furnishing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the newly migrated taxpayers extended.

Extension of date for filing return in FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

Liability of tax arising on account of inadvertent error - mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns The High Court noted the certificates from...

Validity Of assessment order passed - SEZ unit - Supply of services without charging GST since it was a zero rated supply - turnover inadvertently reported under the...

Validity Of Order - Tax demand based on Audit observations - variation between the GSTR 3B return and Form 26AS - The High Court observed that there could be duplication...

Quick Updates: