The case involves a challenge u/s 263 regarding deduction u/s ...

Tribunal Upholds CIT's Re-evaluation Order Due to AO's Insufficient Inquiry on Plant Investment Deduction Under Sec 32AC.

June 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The case involves a challenge u/s 263 regarding deduction u/s 32AC for investment in new plant or machinery. The Principal CIT ordered a de novo readjudication due to lack of inquiry by the AO. The Appellate Tribunal found no follow-up inquiry by the AO, indicating non-application of mind. The appellant's argument on plant acquisition timing should have been raised before the AO, not at later stages. The CIT rightly set aside the matter for reconsideration due to incorrect application of law and presumption of facts by the AO. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, emphasizing the need for proper determination of facts before applying the law. The appellant's interpretation of acquisition and installation was deemed legally questionable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involves a challenge u/s 263 regarding deduction u/s ...

Tribunal Upholds CIT's Re-evaluation Order Due to AO's Insufficient Inquiry on Plant Investment Deduction Under Sec 32AC.

June 13, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the allowability of provisions claimed by the assessee. The Principal Commissioner of...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

Revision u/s 263 - When the order of the AO suffers from a complete lack of enquiry, then the above said principle has no application due to the obvious reason that the...

Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

Revision u/s 263 - lack of inquiry by AO - it is a case where the AO did not make any inquiry vis-à-vis the share premium and simply accepted the details filed by the...

Revision u/s 263 - AO is only required to write decision on contentious issues placed before him and not to write decision on the issues on which sufficient enquiry was...

Revision u/s 263 - the AO also mentioned in the order that “The Documents as submitted by the assessee were examined and placed on record”, however no remark on the...

Tribunal and CIT(A) concurred that Assessing Officer (AO) did not record any finding of undisclosed investment discovered during Excise Department's search, merely...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - no enquiry v/s incomplete enquiry - The valuation was carried at the insistence of the ld. AO to verify the physical existence of the property...

Revision u/s 263 - issue of fresh share in lieu of investment in shares - once, the AO has found that a transaction is not in terms of any money after the detailed...

Undisclosed investment in furniture and fixture - surrender in survey subsequently retracted - onus of proof - If the assessee has denied making any such investment...

Quick Updates: