The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order ...

High Court ruled that petitioner can appeal order passed u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B. Petitioner must file appeal within 15 days for consideration.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 14, 2024

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B, focusing on the alleged violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner filed a writ petition after 30 days from the order date. The court noted that prior notices were issued u/s 143(2) and 142(1), and the petitioner had responded. Despite knowing the deadline, the petitioner sought an adjournment, extending the response deadline. The petitioner attempted to submit a response after office hours, failing to demonstrate prejudice from the assessing officer's actions. The court found the order appealable and, despite no proven prejudice, granted the petitioner liberty to appeal within 15 days with a condonation request. The appellate authority must hear and decide the appeal within 6 weeks, considering the petitioner's response and grounds.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order ...

High Court ruled that petitioner can appeal order passed u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B. Petitioner must file appeal within 15 days for consideration.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 14, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of order passed by the A.O. u/s.143(3) questioned - when the impugned order of reassessment u/s 143(3), in itself had been passed on the...

Validity of assessment u/s 153A/143(3) - wrong reference to a section under which an order is made - the aforesaid mistake cannot be stretched to the extent for...

Validity of assessment order u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 - no intimation of DIN for the impugned order - The case of the assessee is that the communication, namely the...

Condonation of delay of 17 days in filing of appeal - last two days being public holidays - Power of Jurisdiction of NCLAT to condone delay - Applicability of provisions...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - The annulment of assessment done under section 143(3) by the higher judicial authorities, itself, cannot be a ground for reopening - AT

The High Court quashed refund rejection orders for lack of opportunity for personal hearing as mandated by Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017, violating principles of...

Interest u/s 234A(1) or as per Sec. 234A(3) - It has categorically been mentioned in sub-section (3) of Section 234A of the Act that provisions of said sub-section can...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147- non-issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - Non filing of ITR within thirty days after issue of notice u/s. 148 - though the assessee did not file...

Assessment u/s 153C versus 143 - Additions u/s 45 - Underreporting of sale consideration for immovable property while framing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) - Whether...

Validity of reopening of assessment - assessment proceeding u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153C of the Act was completed - When assessment is completed u/s 143(3) or u/s 144 of the...

Scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) - issuance of the statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Change in address - The assessee submitted that he changed his address and the new address...

Quick Updates: