The case involved a rejection of an appeal u/s 128 of the ...

Commissioner (Appeals) rejected appeal as time-barred. Appeal filed after 92 days; only 30-day extension allowed. Appeal rightly rejected.

Case Laws Customs

June 19, 2024

The case involved a rejection of an appeal u/s 128 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the ground of being barred by limitation. The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) was filed after 92 days, exceeding the normal period of 60 days. Section 128 allows for a 30-day extension if sufficient cause is shown. Citing SINGH ENTERPRISES V. COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., JAMSHEDPUR, which interprets a similar provision in the Central Excise Act, it was held that the Commissioner (Appeals) can only condone a delay up to 30 days. As the delay exceeded this period, the rejection of the appeal was deemed appropriate. The decision was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed without any legal infirmity.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The case involved a rejection of an appeal u/s 128 of the ...

Commissioner (Appeals) rejected appeal as time-barred. Appeal filed after 92 days; only 30-day extension allowed. Appeal rightly rejected.

Case Laws Customs

June 19, 2024

You may also like:

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The consultant of the appellant has obtained a copy of the Order in Original on 16.12.2019. The appeal then has to be filed...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before the commissioner (appeals) - the appellate authority has no power to allow the appeal to be presented beyond the period of...

Time limit for filing appeal with Commissioner(A) is 60 days which is extendable by 30 days as per Section 128 of the Customs Act 1962 - Commissioner(A) have no powers...

Refund of excess basic customs duty - Refund rejected on the ground of time limitation - Exercise of Power of Commissioner (appeals) to condone the delay - appeal filed...

Reducing the time provided for furnishing TP report - Now any information, documents required by AO for international transaction U/s 92D has to be furnished within 10...

The High Court interpreted Section 140(5) of the CGST Act regarding transition of credit. The petitioner sought extension under the proviso to Section 140(5) but was...

Seeking Condonation of Delay of 14 days in filing of the Appeal - It is really strange that the agency of the Government failed to seek the required information within...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - sufficient reason for delay provided or not - The limitation for filing appeal as provided under...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - though the Appellant had filed Appeal beyond the statutory period of 60(sixty) days, but it was filed within the condonable...

Condonation of delay - delay in filing an appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) - limitation provided under section 35 of the Act cannot be condoned in filing the appeal...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal u/s 35(1) - The power to condone the delay conferred upon the Commissioner (Appeals) ends if the appeal is preferred after 30 days...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The Commissioner (Appeals) can only condone the delay in filing an appeal if the same is barred by one month and the Commissioner...

Revocation of CBL License - 90 days from the date of issuance of SCN is when the noticee submits reply within 30 days and in a case like this, when the noticee has not...

Condonation of delay of 65 days in filing appeal - It is evident that this Appellate Authority being a creature of the statute is empowered to condone a delay of only a...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - In the present case, in four months, around 121 days come, and the appeal was filed on 121st day. The appellate authority should...

Quick Updates: