ITAT ruled on two issues: 1) Disallowance of contingent ...

Tribunal: 1) Provision on standard assets is allowable as per RBI norms 2) Addition on bad debts provision set aside for re-evaluation

Case Laws Income Tax

June 24, 2024

ITAT ruled on two issues: 1) Disallowance of contingent provision under 36(1)(viia)(d) as unascertained liability. AR cited new provision allowing NBFCs to make provision for bad debts up to 5% total income effective from 01.04.2017. AO & CIT(A) did not consider this. ITAT set aside addition for fresh assessment. 2) Cash received in demonetization period towards loan installment. AO failed to prove lack of depositor identity, transaction genuineness, and creditworthiness. Assessee provided depositor names and KYC details, which AO did not challenge. Citing precedent, ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT ruled on two issues: 1) Disallowance of contingent ...

Tribunal: 1) Provision on standard assets is allowable as per RBI norms 2) Addition on bad debts provision set aside for re-evaluation

Case Laws Income Tax

June 24, 2024

You may also like:

Deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) - provision created for bad and doubtful debts - RBI guidelines prescribes the provision on standard assets from the year ended March 31, 2000...

Provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s 36(1)(viia) against the advances of rural branches - The circular mentions that the provisions of new clause (viia) of section...

MAT - Deduction for provision of bad and doubtful debts while computing book profits u/s.115JB - There is absolutely no quarrel that the case does not fall under Clause...

Provision for bad and doubtful debts of standard asset - the provision for standard assets cannot be equated with the Provision for bad and doubtful debt and the...

The case involves the interpretation of u/s 55(2)(b)(i) and u/s 55(2)(aa)(B)(iiia) of the Income Tax Act regarding the cost of acquisition of bonus shares. The Tribunal...

Addition u/s. 56(2)(viib) - transaction of sale of agricultural land - consideration as per the stamp value - The Tribunal admitted additional evidence provided by the...

Deemed income / addition u/s 41(1) - Recovery of bad debts written off - the bad debts written off did not exceed the credit balance in provision for bad and doubtful...

Non-fulfillment of input output norms as per the allegation of the Department - defective PETs also should be considered as part of the output or not - Applicability of...

Gain on the sale of assets - Long Term capital gain OR Short Term Capital Gains - “financial asset” u/s 2(42A) or not? - Since the intangible assets are covered in the...

Research and Development expenses (R&D Expenses) - Allowability of expenses u/s 35(2) - The expenses are not covered u/s 35(2) - The assessee has not claimed the same...

MAT - Provision for bad and doubtful debts are required to be added to book profit as per clause (i) of explanation [1] to subsection [2] of section 115JB - AT

Deduction towards Provision for bad debts - Addition u/s 36(1)(vii) - The ITAT found that the assessee had made a provision for bad debts but had not actually written...

TP Adjustment - associated enterprise or not - it is evident that sub-Sections (1) and (2) of Section 92A of the Act are interlinked and have to be read together. In...

Disallowance of provision for Bad Debt Written off - provision made by the assessee for bad and doubtful debts is only a provision, but not actual written off of bad...

Addition u/s 37(1) - non-competition fee - revenue or capital expenditure - it does not bring in any capital asset - the payment is allowable u/s 37(1) - HC

Quick Updates: