The Appellate Tribunal addressed the addition u/s 69 concerning ...

Appellate Tribunal upheld deletion of unexplained investment u/s 69. Director's name instead of company's was genuine mistake.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the addition u/s 69 concerning unexplained investment. The issue stemmed from an agreement displaying the individual name of the assessee, a director of the company, instead of the company's name. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, noting a genuine mistake rectified later. Section 69 criteria were examined, requiring unrecorded investments with no satisfactory explanation. The Tribunal found the provided explanation credible and supported by evidence, thus dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the addition u/s 69 concerning ...

Appellate Tribunal upheld deletion of unexplained investment u/s 69. Director's name instead of company's was genuine mistake.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 27, 2024

You may also like:

Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The tribunal closely examined the additions made under Section 69 related to unexplained investments in stock. The assessees argued that...

The ITAT Raipur considered the addition u/s 69 or 56(2)(vii)(b) concerning the variance between guideline rates and actual purchase prices of immovable property. The...

Addition u/s 69 - Unexplained investment or not - only when the investment is not recorded in the books of accounts or the explanation by the assessee regarding the...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 51.20 lacs as unexplained investment u/ss 69 or 56(2)(x)/6(2)(vii) was unjustified as there was no evidence of...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The aspect that this income was not declared in the original return of income cannot be a ground to automatically conclude that it is...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 – Assessee paid up additional stamp duty on valuation - This by itself would not mean that the assessee made any unexplained investment - HC

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act for share application money received from various individuals. The company failed to prove the...

Addition u/s 69 - The dispute arose from the purchase of immovable properties by the assessee, where the payment was made through cheques but not disclosed in the books....

Unexplained investment/unexplained cash credit under section 68 & 69 - no addition is called for on account of baseless allegation of unexplained investment by the...

Unexplained money u/s 69A or investment u/s 69 - Once an AO finds that an investment has been made, he has to examine the Assessee's explanation as to the source of that...

Unexplained investment u/s. 69 - Asstt. Comm. of Commercial Taxes estimated the valuation of WIP without mentioning the quantity or rate of the individual item - AO...

Addition u/s 69 - unexplained investment made in purchase of land - no asset came into existence in the name of the assessee, which requires to be shown in the books of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The documents, which were found in the possession of other person, does not bear the name of the assessee, that is, the name of the...

Quick Updates: