Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer ...


Tax authorities can directly issue reopening notices post-search; faceless assessment to eliminate interface.

Case Laws     Income Tax

October 25, 2024

The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) has valid jurisdiction to issue a notice u/s 148 for reopening of assessment, even in cases of search and seizure u/s 132. The faceless assessment scheme u/s 151A mandates recording satisfaction by the JAO before issuing such notice, but does not preclude the JAO from issuing the notice directly. The Court observed that the scheme aims to eliminate interface between tax authorities and assessees to the extent technologically feasible. The petitioner's challenge to the notice on grounds of lack of jurisdiction was rejected. The Court noted that satisfaction notes were provided, and subsequent proceedings like notice u/s 142(1) were issued by the Verification Unit of the Faceless Assessment Centre. The petitioners were advised to pursue remedies before the competent authority and seek virtual hearings if required, ensuring strict compliance with the law.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment proceedings related to international tax charges must comply with the mandatory faceless procedure...

  2. Faceless assessment scheme - jurisdictional issue regarding Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) issuing notice u/s 148 for reassessment. Principal authority's power...

  3. Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

  4. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  5. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

  6. Validity of reopening income tax assessment proceedings. The key points are: the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) issued the notice for reopening assessment...

  7. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  8. The High Court held that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) is not permitted to issue a notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, as it would violate the provisions...

  9. The High Court addressed the issue of faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151A scheme. It held that notices must be issued in a faceless manner as...

  10. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  11. Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

  12. Issue of faceless assessment of income escaping assessment, where the notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act was issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)...

  13. Notice/summons issued by the Central Tax Authority whereas adjudication u/s 74 had been made by the State Authority - the initiation of the proceeding for imposition of...

  14. Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

  15. This case deals with the validity of a notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) in light of the provisions of Section...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates