The Appellate Tribunal addressed the claim of deduction u/s 32AD ...

Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee, Grants Deduction u/s 32AD Despite Notification Timing Dispute.

June 28, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the claim of deduction u/s 32AD for additional investment allowance on an investment made in the financial year 2015-16. The issue arose due to a difference of opinion among the Tribunal members. The Central Government's notification regarding backward areas was a key point of contention. One member upheld the denial of the claim based on the timing of the notification, while another member allowed the deduction for the relevant financial years. The Tribunal ultimately ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the purpose of section 32AD is to provide a benefit for a period of 5 years, and that the notification should be interpreted liberally in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the notification did not override the provisions of section 32AD, and the assessee was entitled to the deduction under the said section.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the claim of deduction u/s 32AD ...

Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee, Grants Deduction u/s 32AD Despite Notification Timing Dispute.

June 28, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the following issues: TP adjustment on international transactions for sale of goods, disallowance u/s 14A read...

Grant received from holding company as capital receipt - AO has not specifically invoked section 56(2). The dubious method adopted by the assessee of claiming the...

The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned on deposits with a Cooperative Bank. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A)...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the assessee's application for registration u/s 80G was filed within the statutory time limit. The Tribunal directed the...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility...

The case pertains to the determination of the date of "purchase" for claiming deduction u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act. The issue revolves around whether the assessee has...

Regarding the deduction u/s 80IA, the Tribunal affirmed that ground handling and cargo handling services provided by the assessee were covered within the scope of...

The ITAT held that the order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal observed that the order disregarded the...

Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

Interpretation to the addendum of notification - Available limit of exemption - The Restrictive Notification is not an addendum or corrigendum to the Exemption...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

Stay of recovery - ground for stay - Tribunal should have borne in mind while granting an interim order is that the assessee should have made out a prima facie case; the...

LTCG - deduction u/s 54 denied - Despite the assessee's claim of having constructed a residential property within the specified timeframe, a physical inspection revealed...

Deduction u/s 80IB(10) - Whether building was completed within the stipulated time? - When the completion / occupation certificate was handed over to the...

Quick Updates: