The High Court considered the validity of reopening an ...

Court ruled notice to reassess tax invalid as approval was still in effect.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 28, 2024

The High Court considered the validity of reopening an assessment based on excess funds not being part of an "approved refund" and thus subject to taxation. The Court noted that the approval to hold the fund was withdrawn only from the date of the order, not before. The Tribunal found that the withdrawal of approval would only take effect from the date of the order, not earlier. Therefore, the notice issued for reopening the assessment was deemed invalid as the approval was still in effect at the time. The Tribunal rightly set aside the notice and subsequent reassessment order due to the lack of communication regarding the withdrawal of approval by the Commissioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered the validity of reopening an ...

Court ruled notice to reassess tax invalid as approval was still in effect.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 28, 2024

You may also like:

Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

The High Court addressed the validity of an assessment against a company that had been dissolved. The court ruled that demand/penalty notices issued post-approval of the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) - With Regard to the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, the High Court questions...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Validity of grant the approval by the PCIT - relevancy of information reported by Insight portal - Despite the petitioner's...

The Madras High Court considered the issue of personal hearing notice u/s FEMA 1999. The Court held that Rule 4(3) does not require the reasoned opinion to be...

The High Court addressed the issue of linking services provided by a company to its separate registered units for taxation purposes under CENVAT Credit Rules. The court...

Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner with retrospective effect - vague SCN and impugned order - The court noted that the petitioner's response to the show...

The ITAT Delhi held that the reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as the JCIT granted approval mechanically without proper application of mind. The JCIT's...

Supplementary refund of unutilized input tax credit pertaining to Compensatory Cess - Section 164 of the GST Act empowers the Government to frame rules. Refund of...

Jurisdiction to issue SCN - Ocean Freight - contention of the petitioner is to the effect that, what has been sought to be invoked the Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated...

Petitioner seeking declaration that rule 11B(2)(c) of Central Sales Tax (Kerala) Rules,1957 as invalid and ultra vires being in consistent with Central Sales Tax...

Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - appropriate authority - if Joint Commissioner approves the proceedings/ proposal sent by the Assessing Officer to be a fit...

Validity of issuance of notice under Section 153C - The issuance of the invalid notice dated 14.06.2019 does not compromise the assessment proceedings as, the invalid...

Quick Updates: