The High Court considered the validity of reopening an ...

Court ruled notice to reassess tax invalid as approval was still in effect.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 28, 2024

The High Court considered the validity of reopening an assessment based on excess funds not being part of an "approved refund" and thus subject to taxation. The Court noted that the approval to hold the fund was withdrawn only from the date of the order, not before. The Tribunal found that the withdrawal of approval would only take effect from the date of the order, not earlier. Therefore, the notice issued for reopening the assessment was deemed invalid as the approval was still in effect at the time. The Tribunal rightly set aside the notice and subsequent reassessment order due to the lack of communication regarding the withdrawal of approval by the Commissioner.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court considered the validity of reopening an ...

Court ruled notice to reassess tax invalid as approval was still in effect.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 28, 2024

You may also like:

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the show-cause notice dated 20.08.2024 issued by the respondent authority in relation to the refund of integrated taxes...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Method of communication of notice - The High Court examined the provisions of Section 282(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 127(1) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962...

Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

The High Court addressed the validity of an assessment against a company that had been dissolved. The court ruled that demand/penalty notices issued post-approval of the...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validity of order passed u/s 148A(d) - With Regard to the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, the High Court questions...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Validity of grant the approval by the PCIT - relevancy of information reported by Insight portal - Despite the petitioner's...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

This notification specifies that Form 3CEDA (Application for rollback of an Advance Pricing Agreement) and Form 3C-O (Application form for approval under sub-section (1)...

Quick Updates: