The Competition Commission of India found that the Respondent ...

Competition Commission found Respondent didn't pass on GST benefits, profiteered Rs. 48,25,970. Ordered to refund with interest.

Case Laws GST

July 2, 2024

The Competition Commission of India found that the Respondent engaged in profiteering by not passing on the benefit of reduced GST rates to ticket recipients, resulting in a profiteered amount of Rs. 48,25,970. The Respondent was directed to reduce ticket prices and deposit the profiteered amount with interest. The amount was to be split between the Central and Telangana State Consumer Welfare Funds. The Respondent was given 3 months to comply, failure of which would lead to recovery by the tax authorities. While the Respondent violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, the penalty u/s 171(3A) could not be imposed retrospectively as it was not in effect during the violation period. Application was disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Competition Commission of India found that the Respondent ...

Competition Commission found Respondent didn't pass on GST benefits, profiteered Rs. 48,25,970. Ordered to refund with interest.

Case Laws GST

July 2, 2024

You may also like:

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate...

Profiteering - purchase of fiats - it is alleged that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on to the Applicant No. 1 and Applicant No, 2 by way of...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - supply of “American Tourister Sky Tracer HL Blue 68 cm Hard Trolley” - allegation that the Respondent did not reduce the selling price of the above...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

Lack of mandatory pre-deposit of 7.5% - during the course of investigation Rs. 7,81,861/- was actually paid by the appellants which has been appropriated towards total...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The Authority finds that, had the Respondent excluded the land...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The Authority takes cognizance, based on the DGAP’s verification, that the Respondent No. 2 has passed on benefit as per Table-N above...

Quick Updates: