Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond ...

Recalculation of Cenvat Credit and Penalty Ordered Due to Non-Disclosure and Improper Claims for 2008-2010.

July 6, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond prescribed caps, failing to maintain separate accounts for common inputs/services used for taxable and exempted services during 2008-09 to 2009-10. Cenvat Credit Rules cap credit utilization at 20% for exempted services. Appellants entitled to opt for payment equivalent to credit attributable to inputs/services used for exempted services u/r 6(3A), requiring recalculation. Extended period invoked rightly as appellants deliberately didn't disclose non-maintenance of separate accounts. Penalty u/s 78 warranted for non-payment of service tax, quantum requiring redetermination. Matter remanded for recalculating recoverable credit, interest, and penalty after considering appellants' documents and calculations.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellants wrongfully availed excess Cenvat credit beyond ...

Recalculation of Cenvat Credit and Penalty Ordered Due to Non-Disclosure and Improper Claims for 2008-2010.

July 6, 2024

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - surrender of registration - the appellant is entitled for refund claim of unutilized cenvat credit lying in their cenvat credit...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning refund of CVD and ACD. Original authority's rejection was based on contradictory findings - accepting CA certificate showing non-passing...

The case involves eligibility of CENVAT Credit on input services for output services including short-term accommodation, restaurant, rent-a-cab, and consultancy services....

CENVAT Credit - denial of Cenvat Credit on the ground that the appellant have taken the Cenvat Credit suo-moto as they have also filed the refund claim - The appellant...

Penalty - CENVAT credit on G.T.A. - CENVAT Credit received and utilized both for traded as well as manufactured goods were duly accounted for in the CENVAT Credit...

Eligibility for input CENVAT credit utilization, invocation of extended period of limitation, and imposition of fines and penalties in a case involving job-worked goods....

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

The appellant was denied CENVAT credit on the allegation that the sender units inflated the value of Soap Noodles stock transferred to the appellant, leading to excess...

The case involved a dispute over CENVAT Credit denial based on a board circular alleging undervaluation of assets and claiming dual benefits. The Circular merely advised...

Cenvat credit claims on spare parts considered as capital goods were rejected u/ss 11B and 12B of the Cenvat Excise Act. As per the definition of "Inputs" in Rule 2(k)...

HC set aside assessment order due to violation of natural justice principles, specifically addressing non-speaking order deficiency in tax proceedings involving output...

Denial of refund claimed u/s 142(3) of CGST Act for service tax paid under RCM was incorrect. Rule 9(1)(e) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 applies, not Rule 9(1)(bb),...

Refund of CENVAT Credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification

CENVAT Credit - non-reversal of proportionate credit - From application of the definition of ‘exempted services’ in rule 2 (e) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, to the facts...

Denial of re-credit of Cenvat credit - if the appellant does not take any credit then no such mal-practice can happen and no credit can be accumulated. Moreover, it also...

Quick Updates: