Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Assessee failed to file return of income u/s 139 but received ...


Assessee failed to file return, received notice u/s 148. Despite presumptive taxation, liable to maintain books u/s 44AA.

July 27, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Assessee failed to file return of income u/s 139 but received notice u/s 148. Despite opting for presumptive taxation scheme u/s 44AD, which does not require maintaining books of accounts, assessee was liable to maintain books as stipulated u/s 44AA. Assessee cannot claim benefit of not complying with Section 68 regarding unexplained cash deposits in bank account. Assessee was required to explain sources, genuineness, and creditors' creditworthiness regarding cash deposits as per Section 68. Failing to do so, authorities rightly invoked Section 68 and added cash deposits as assessee's income under its deeming fiction. Case laws relied upon by assessee were decided on their own facts and inapplicable. Assessee's appeal dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  2. AO levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as assessee failed to file return u/s 139 or in response to notice u/s 148, despite receiving substantial contract receipts of Rs. 2.5...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147- non-issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - Non filing of ITR within thirty days after issue of notice u/s. 148 - though the assessee did not file...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - When the A.O. admits in the notice under section 142(1) Dated 20.10.2014 that assessee filed return of income under section 148 of the...

  5. Validity of assessment u/s 147 - it is not a return u/s 119(2)(b) albeit it is a return filed in response to notice u/s 148 which has been accepted by the AO. Thus, when...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of reopening assessment u/s 147 and estimation of income from cash deposits u/s 69A. The Tribunal noted that the assessee...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  8. Penalty u/s 271F - Failure to file the ITR before the due date - No doubt, the assessee has failed to furnish the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act, but when the...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee in response to the notice u/s 148 has offered capital gain and paid taxes thereon - Going by the language of section 148, that any such...

  11. The assessee, a works contractor, filed a return in compliance with Section 153A notice and claimed deduction u/s 80IA, which was not claimed in the original return...

  12. This case deals with the validity of assessment proceedings initiated against an amalgamated company for the assessment year 2018-19. The key points are: The Assessing...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for not filing the return of income (ROI), despite having a bona fide belief that the income was non-taxable and tax...

  14. Charging interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C - late filing of return of income - CIT(A) was not right in levying interest under Section 234A of the Act when the return was...

  15. Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates