The appellant did not acquire a new residential property within ...

Appellant Entitled to Section 54 Deduction as Correct Interpretation Considers Payment and Possession Date of New Property.

July 27, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The appellant did not acquire a new residential property within the specified time period, failing the mandatory condition for deduction u/s 54. The CIT(A)-NFAC incorrectly invoked the "one year before the transfer" limb, concluding that the assessee is ineligible for deduction. However, the relevant date for computing the limitation u/s 54 in all three eventualities is the payment of consideration and possession of the new property. Judicial precedents support this interpretation. The assessee is entitled to the deduction u/s 54.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The appellant did not acquire a new residential property within ...

Appellant Entitled to Section 54 Deduction as Correct Interpretation Considers Payment and Possession Date of New Property.

July 27, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Deduction u/s 43B - payment of bonus - u/s 43B only actual payment and not any notional or deemed payment that would be relevant for considering the deduction - HC

Denial of deduction claimed under Chapter VI-A i.e. Section 80G/ 80GGA read with Section 35AC - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the appellant had not claimed the...

Interest liability - seeking waiver of interest since the payment of service tax was paid under the amnesty scheme - The tribunal observed that the appellant's payment...

The appellant, a large account reseller authorized by Microsoft, received IT services from Microsoft for which payments were made. The department alleged that Microsoft...

TDS u/s 194H or 192 - addition u/s 40(a)(ia) - Non-deduction of TDS on payment of commission to directors - appellant considered payment as salary and deducted TDS u/s...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Non-deduction of TDS - When the assessee has submitted necessary declaration in Form Nos.15G/15H for non-deduction of TDS and also for reversal of TDS deduction on...

ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision allowing deduction of Finance Lease Rental Payments under section 37(1) as revenue expenditure. Revenue's appeal challenging depreciation...

SVLDRS - Benefit of the Amnesty Scheme opted - failure to make payment on account of technical glitch or not - Despite the appellant's assertion of technical glitches,...

Liquidation process costs - expenses for preventing any damage due to possible collision between the vessels - The liquidator took action after receiving consent from...

Deduction u/s 43B - Payment of Excise duty - double deduction or not - The High Court held that, Section 43B of the Act, which came to be introduced from Assessment Year...

The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

Addition u/s 40A - Cash expenditure exceeding the threshold of Rs. 20,000/- - The appellant/assessee argued that the payments made through supervisors, who were...

Classification of goods - Any interpretation that makes the specific entry, ‘motor spirit’ and its definition appearing in supplementary notes, otiose, cannot be the...

Long-term capital gains deduction u/s 54F can be claimed for investment in a residential property not solely owned by the assessee. The assessing officer's sole...

Quick Updates: