Classification dispute for imported goods under Customs Tariff ...

Customs classification dispute resolved. No wilful suppression found. Correct classification accepted after examination. Differential duty paid.

Case Laws Customs

July 31, 2024

Classification dispute for imported goods under Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Appellant declared details, goods physically examined. No wilful suppression of facts attributable for Section 28(4) applicability. Earlier, Customs authorities permitted clearance under appellant's classification. Commissioner held Section 28(4) invoking provisions inapplicable, being a case of misclassification only. Correct classification accepted, differential duty paid upon informing. Impugned order set aside by Appellate Tribunal, appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Classification dispute for imported goods under Customs Tariff ...

Customs classification dispute resolved. No wilful suppression found. Correct classification accepted after examination. Differential duty paid.

Case Laws Customs

July 31, 2024

You may also like:

Classification of imported goods - Magnetic Iron Centre Copper/Centre Core Assembly - Although it is found that Rule 1 of Interpretation read with Section Note 2 itself...

Demand of customs duty invoking extended period of limitation - the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided all relevant information and documents at the time of...

Validity of SCN proposing to declare the petitioners as wilful defaulters - Classification of Account as NPA - Impact of CIRP proceedings under IBC - The High Court held...

Classification of imported goods - medical grade monitor - to be classified under heading 8529 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - monitors of every kind...

This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs....

Invocation of extended period of limitation - wilful suppression of facts - Even suppression of facts has to be wilful and in any case, suppression has also to be with...

Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

Scope of SCN - The appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals) is also with regard to the classification issue but the Commissioner(Appeals) has wrongly converted the...

Extended period of limitation - It is clear that even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when “suppression’ is...

Levy of IGST or Customs Duty - Classification of goods - Bronze Cladding Panel for Statue of Unity Project - irrespective whether the classification claimed by the...

This instruction clarifies that Customs Brokers should not be routinely implicated as co-noticees in cases involving interpretative disputes, unless their abetment in...

Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire facts were available on record and on this there is no dispute; nor is there any contrary finding by the adjudicating authority. The...

Extended period of limitation - the positive action with a negative intention of wilful and deliberate default is a mandatory prerequisite to conclude wilful...

Validity of SCN - Levy of Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act on CHA - abetment of offence committed by the importer as against which the petitioner - scope of Sections...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - It would not be unreasonable to assume that if the shipping bill is filed by Customs Broker X and the person representing the...

Quick Updates: