Classification dispute for imported goods under Customs Tariff ...

Customs classification dispute resolved. No wilful suppression found. Correct classification accepted after examination. Differential duty paid.

July 31, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Classification dispute for imported goods under Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Appellant declared details, goods physically examined. No wilful suppression of facts attributable for Section 28(4) applicability. Earlier, Customs authorities permitted clearance under appellant's classification. Commissioner held Section 28(4) invoking provisions inapplicable, being a case of misclassification only. Correct classification accepted, differential duty paid upon informing. Impugned order set aside by Appellate Tribunal, appeal allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Classification dispute for imported goods under Customs Tariff ...

Customs classification dispute resolved. No wilful suppression found. Correct classification accepted after examination. Differential duty paid.

July 31, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Classification of imported goods - Magnetic Iron Centre Copper/Centre Core Assembly - Although it is found that Rule 1 of Interpretation read with Section Note 2 itself...

Demand of customs duty invoking extended period of limitation - the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided all relevant information and documents at the time of...

Validity of SCN proposing to declare the petitioners as wilful defaulters - Classification of Account as NPA - Impact of CIRP proceedings under IBC - The High Court held...

Classification of imported goods - medical grade monitor - to be classified under heading 8529 of First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - monitors of every kind...

This case pertains to the utilization of ineligible CENVAT credit by a company. The key points are: The company availed ineligible CENVAT credit amounting to Rs....

Invocation of extended period of limitation - wilful suppression of facts - Even suppression of facts has to be wilful and in any case, suppression has also to be with...

Mere non-payment of duties is not collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts - Article

Sewing machine needles classification under Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - sub-heading 8452 30 or tariff item 8448 5190 disputed. Declared value rejected, anti-dumping duty...

Scope of SCN - The appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals) is also with regard to the classification issue but the Commissioner(Appeals) has wrongly converted the...

Extended period of limitation - It is clear that even when an assessee has suppressed facts, the extended period of limitation can be invoked only when “suppression’ is...

Levy of IGST or Customs Duty - Classification of goods - Bronze Cladding Panel for Statue of Unity Project - irrespective whether the classification claimed by the...

Customs broker misclassified goods (safety matches) to obtain higher MEIS benefit for exporter. Charges were levied u/s 114(iii) of Customs Act, 1962. Key points:...

This case deals with the classification of handcrafted stone articles like 'Chakla Belan' (rolling board and pin), mortar, pestle, etc. for export under the Merchandise...

Revocation of Customs Broker License - It would not be unreasonable to assume that if the shipping bill is filed by Customs Broker X and the person representing the...

HC affirmed penalties under Section 74 of CGST Act against petitioner for wilful suppression of facts through non-filing of monthly returns and non-payment of GST....

Quick Updates: