Appellant produced wrong 'Country-of-Origin' certificate to ...

Appellant's Notification Benefit Claim Rejected for Mis-declaration; Section 114A & 114AA Penalties Modified, Partial Appeal Allowed.

August 1, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

Appellant produced wrong 'Country-of-Origin' certificate to claim notification benefit, amounting to mis-declaration and suppression of facts. Duty along with interest and reduced penalty u/s 114A paid. Claim for notification benefit at appellate stage rejected as certificates to be produced at clearance time. Levy of penalty u/s 114A and 114AA upheld, as both independent, but penalty under 114AA on proprietor set aside, as proprietor and firm being one entity, cannot be penalized twice for same offence. Impugned order modified, appeal partially allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appellant produced wrong 'Country-of-Origin' certificate to ...

Appellant's Notification Benefit Claim Rejected for Mis-declaration; Section 114A & 114AA Penalties Modified, Partial Appeal Allowed.

August 1, 2024

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The appellant claimed refund of Service Tax based on actuals and documents as per Notification 41/2012, but the claim was rejected for non-compliance with...

Benefit of exemption from customs duty - Import of Microphone for Cellular Mobile Phone - even the appellant does not claim the benefit under a particular Notification...

The case before CESTAT Bangalore involved a refund claim seeking the benefit of a Notification under the Indo-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement. The issue was whether the...

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

The appellant had initially exported Indian tea to Netherlands, which was rejected and recalled to India. Upon re-importation, no DEPB claim was advanced. The goods were...

Denial the benefit of the exemption notification no. 45/2017-Cus and 46/2017-Cus - Re-importation of the goods - The appellant exported goods to Thailand but faced...

Rejection of refund claim - eligible exemption - In the facts of the present case, there are no clear averments made by the appellant that conditions prescribed under...

Refund of duty paid on self assessment basis - Refund of the Cenvat credit reversed - benefit of exemption notification - The High court scrutinizes the appellant's...

The appellants, who were neither exporters nor Customs House Agents (CHAs), were wrongly penalized u/ss 114 and 114AA for overvaluation of goods for claiming excess duty...

CESTAT held that appellant was entitled to benefit under N/N. 94/96-Cus for imported goods that were initially exported and returned. While the adjudicating authority...

Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded...

Penalty u/s112(a), 112(b) & 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - fraudulent import of vehicles declared as brand new vehicles of foreign origin - the proceeding is hit by...

Levy of penalty - mis-declaration of description of imported goods - Having found that the appellant had no intention, the Commissioner (Appeals) has still proceed to...

EPCG Scheme - denial of benefit on the ground that coverage under two benefits was claimed. - there is no reason that the benefit of exemption under notification no....

Interest rate on delayed refunds u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944 restricted to 6% p.a. as per Notification 67/2003-CE (N.T.), overruling appellant's claim of 12%....

Quick Updates: