Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of ...

Importer challenged confiscation, fine & penalty for alleged mis-declaration of value when show cause was for prohibited goods import.

Case Laws Customs

August 1, 2024

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of prohibited goods. Petitioner replied and attended personal hearing. Impugned order did not discuss hazardous waste issue, implying acceptance of petitioner's explanation as per precedent. However, order rejected declared value, ordered confiscation for re-export, imposed redemption fine and penalty for mis-declaration of assessable value. Since show cause notice pertained to import of prohibited goods, not mis-declaration of value, impugned order set aside under Article 226. Petition disposed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of ...

Importer challenged confiscation, fine & penalty for alleged mis-declaration of value when show cause was for prohibited goods import.

Case Laws Customs

August 1, 2024

You may also like:

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Confiscation of export goods set aside by Appellate Tribunal. Exporter's explanation accepted regarding mismatch between goods and invoice. No deliberate mis-declaration...

The case involved verification of Certificate of Origin and non-compliance of FSSAI Regulations u/s 111(m) and 112(a) of the Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the goods...

Absolute confiscation of counterfeit goods upheld as appellant relinquished title and claimed non-ownership. For other mis-declared goods, transaction value rejected u/r...

Confiscation of goods - Redemption fine - Imposition of penalty - Valuation dispute - The case involved the importation of machinery where the foreign supplier...

Confiscation - imposition of redemption fine and penalties - mis-declaration of imported goods - the overseas supper had wrongly shipped different types of goods -...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The...

Confiscation - mis-declaration of quantity of goods - there is no dispute that the weight in the invoice was mentioned as per the theoretical weight basis by taking a...

Confiscation - redemption fine - penalty - illegal export by resorting to gross mis-declaration about the ‘Fe’ content - It is seen that the Test Report itself was...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple issues raised in the appeals concerning the classification of Rubber Processing Oil (RPO), enhancement of its imported value,...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Liability of redemption fine when goods are confiscated - redemption fine, is an option in lieu of confiscation and hence, both cannot run simultaneously, which means...

The case pertains to the import of restricted goods, specifically marbles and mosaics, under the Import Policy at a value lower than the Minimum Import Price notified by...

Quick Updates: