Adjudication Order penalized under FEMA - Writ of Mandamus to ...

Court orders release of funds to petitioners frozen by 1st respondent under FEMA. High Court grants Writ, mandates Bank to release Fixed Deposit amount.

Case Laws FEMA

August 8, 2024

Adjudication Order penalized under FEMA - Writ of Mandamus to foreclose fixed deposit created by first respondent using petitioners' money and direct Bank to release funds to petitioners. During proceedings under Foreign Exchange Management Act, first respondent froze petitioners' accounts and transferred funds. With proceedings dropped per Adjudication Order, High Court allows Writ Petition, directing release of Fixed Deposit amount to petitioners promptly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Adjudication Order penalized under FEMA - Writ of Mandamus to ...

Court orders release of funds to petitioners frozen by 1st respondent under FEMA. High Court grants Writ, mandates Bank to release Fixed Deposit amount.

Case Laws FEMA

August 8, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment without releasing seized documents by Crime branch - Petitioner seeking the release of seized documents and items to effectively respond to...

Freezing of Bank Account of petitioner - non-release of the export shipment made by the petitioner - Since the petitioner has not given separate representation for...

Release of the Amount Seized along with interest u/s 132B(4) read with Rule 119A - Scope of the term 'shall release' - The High court held that the petitioner is...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

The High Court directed the respondents to release all refunds due and payable to the petitioner within three weeks, pursuant to the appellate authority's order dated...

The High Court considered the maintainability of an appeal against an Order-in-Original and jurisdiction to pass an order in appeal under the Finance Act, 1994. The...

The petitioner's products were previously classified under heading 7615 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, but the Department contended that some products should be...

High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging refund rejection order, observing that respondent authority had passed reasoned order after considering...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Freezing the Demat Accounts of the petitioners - The Calcutta High Court adjudicated on the legality of freezing Demat Accounts of petitioners, directors of a listed...

The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed...

The Calcutta High Court dealt with a case involving a conviction u/s 57 of FERA for non-realization of export proceeds, which was later repealed and replaced by FEMA....

The High Court quashed the orders issued by the tax authorities after scrutiny of GST returns u/s 61, as the principles of natural justice were violated by not providing...

The Chhattisgarh High Court considered the maintainability of a petition challenging an order issued u/s 73(1) of the GST Act. The court noted that the order was...

Quick Updates: