High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging ...

Dismissing refund plea, Court upholds reasoned order; directs statutory appeal route over writ jurisdiction.

August 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging refund rejection order, observing that respondent authority had passed reasoned order after considering petitioner's reply and deficiencies in refund application. Court held that petitioner ought to have availed statutory appeal remedy instead of directly approaching Court. Under Article 226, High Court's jurisdiction in certiorari is supervisory, limited to correcting errors of jurisdiction or natural justice violations, not re-appreciating evidence. Appellate forum offers wider canvas than writ jurisdiction. Petition dismissed, with liberty to pursue statutory appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging ...

Dismissing refund plea, Court upholds reasoned order; directs statutory appeal route over writ jurisdiction.

August 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking directions to the respondents to issue a refund of Integrated Goods & Services Tax (IGST)...

Maintainability of appeal against order under CGST/SGST Act adjudication on refund application dismissed. Appellant had option to pay amounts demanded or contest seizure...

The case involved a dispute over the writ jurisdiction of the High Court post privatization of (AIL) by a private corporate entity. - Erstwhile Public sector undertaking...

Conviction u/ss 420, 467, 468, 120B of the IPC and Section 5(2) and 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Petitioner worked as Appraiser in Customs office....

HC upholds maintainability of writ petition under Article 226 concerning regulatory oversight of ECL. Petitioner challenged RBI's failure to exercise statutory powers...

Invocation of extraordinary writ jurisdiction - petitioner not entitled to exclusion of time taken in writ proceedings from limitation period for filing appeal. Abuse of...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Petition maintainability hinges on alternative remedy availability. Excess tax refund due to ignorance and legal ambiguity. Supreme Court ruled that purely legal...

Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

Refund of IGST - Zero Rated Supplies - it appears that the writ-applicant had claimed higher duty drawback - it is evident that the petitioner has claimed drawback of...

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

HC dismissed petitions challenging territorial jurisdiction of Additional Commissioner, Kanpur to adjudicate show cause notices (SCNs) issued by DGGI Ahmedabad under...

Service tax refund claim filed beyond statutory limitation period cannot be entertained. Refund application must be filed within one year from relevant date as per...

Quick Updates: