Onus on petitioner partnership firm to show unexplained ...

Petitioner firm failed to prove Rs 1.01 cr investment/expense belonged to partners. Rental income used for maintenance.

August 10, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Onus on petitioner partnership firm to show unexplained investment and expenditure belonged to partners. No records showing partners had substantial income to lend Rs. 1.01 crore. Firm had rental income used for maintenance. No infirmity in impugned order rejecting petition u/s 264. Objection on non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) within 6 months not countenanced as not raised earlier. Section 292BB deems notice valid if assessee participated in proceedings, except if no notice issued. Explanatory Note to Finance Act, 2008 clarifies legal fiction inapplicable if objection not raised before assessment completion. Petition dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Onus on petitioner partnership firm to show unexplained ...

Petitioner firm failed to prove Rs 1.01 cr investment/expense belonged to partners. Rental income used for maintenance.

August 10, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings against firm and partners u/s 271(1)(c) – the amounts invested in the Fixed Deposit Receipts belongs to the firm and the income also belong to the...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Transfer of an industrial undertaking from urban to rural area by a partnership firm qualifies for exemption u/s 54G of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, a partner in...

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

Disallowance of interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) - partners of the assessee firm had over withdrawn an amount as in excess of what was brought by them in the firm - the assessee...

Right of bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C - offence u/s 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), 132(1)(1)(i) of CGST Act, 2017 - The statutory period as provided under Section 167(2) Cr.P....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 justified due to tangible material available with Assessing Officer (AO) to form reasonable belief regarding escapement of income....

Research and Development expenses (R&D Expenses) - Allowability of expenses u/s 35(2) - The expenses are not covered u/s 35(2) - The assessee has not claimed the same...

ITAT upheld penalties imposed under s.271(1)(c) against appellant firm for multiple violations. Unexplained cash credits in partners' capital accounts violated...

The petitioner sought regular bail in a money laundering case alleging that he had projected and concealed proceeds of crime related to a scheduled offense. The court...

The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

Vicarious liability of partner of the firm - separate identity of partnership firm - merely the petitioner running a firm, but it is not a legal entity and it cannot be...

SEBI notifies that individual investment advisers, principal officers of non-individual investment advisers, associated persons providing investment advice, and partners...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

Application seeking regular bail granted - accused allegedly formed bogus firms and evaded tax payments - offences u/ss 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c) and 132(1)(l)(l) of GST Act...

Quick Updates: