Property forfeited under SAFEMA was also subject to TADA ...

Appeal Dismissed: Court Rules TADA and SAFEMA Proceedings Separate; No Natural Justice Violation Found.

August 13, 2024

Case Laws FEMA AT

Property forfeited under SAFEMA was also subject to TADA proceedings. The court held that TADA provisions are distinct from SAFEMA, citing a previous Supreme Court judgment. Declaratory suits filed by the Appellant in the Bombay High Court have no bearing on the SAFEMA proceedings. The validity of the notice u/s 6 of SAFEMA does not require establishing a nexus between the Detenue's income and the property. The appeal challenging the impugned order was rejected. The principles of natural justice were not violated despite the final hearing being brief and decided by the same Authority. The property in question, Aqdas Mahal, was acquired structurally, but without supporting loan agreements. The Appellant failed to provide evidence of the property's source of acquisition. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Property forfeited under SAFEMA was also subject to TADA ...

Appeal Dismissed: Court Rules TADA and SAFEMA Proceedings Separate; No Natural Justice Violation Found.

August 13, 2024

Case Laws FEMA AT

You may also like:

The case involves property forfeiture under SAFEMA, which was also part of TADA proceedings. The Appellant's challenge based on different statutes was rejected. The...

Blocking of a supplier's credit ledger by mentioning 'Registration of supplier has been cancelled' without issuing a show cause notice violates principles of natural...

The central issue revolves around the maintainability of a single appeal filed by the Revenue against multiple Bills of Entry. As per Rule 6(A) of the CESTAT Procedure...

Petitioner's demat accounts were attached/frozen despite ceasing to be director of company, violating natural justice principles. HC held prima facie petitioner's...

Dishonour of Cheque - Effect of arbitration proceedings - The High Court referred to a Supreme Court judgment which clarified that arbitration proceedings and...

Principles of natural justice necessitate that the Petitioner be given a personal hearing by Respondent No. 4 (Joint Commissioner of State Tax Appeals) before any order...

Principles of Natural justice - appeal by Revenue - The manner in which this appeal has been filed appears to be very mechanical without application of mind to the case...

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

Petitioner challenged validity of re-assessment u/s 148A. HC quashed impugned order and notice initiating re-assessment proceedings issued by 3rd Respondent. HC held...

Notices issued to a deceased person and subsequent assessment orders passed based on such notices are void ab initio, violating principles of natural justice. The High...

Violation of principles of natural justice - availment of fraudulent credit - The respondents have completed the entire proceedings within two months and there is...

Assessment u/s 144B - violation of principle of natural justice - series of adjournments were granted on the prayer of the petitioner from time to time - petitioner...

Principles of Natural Justice - petitioner argues that none of the notices as are required to be served under Section 129 of the GST Act have been served upon the...

If the Revenue was aggrieved with the decision of learned Commissioner (Appeals) in respect of both the appeals filed by the assessee, it should have filed two separate...

Principles of natural justice violated - no opportunity of hearing provided, order passed without assigning reasons for cancellation of registration. Cancellation order...

Quick Updates: