The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the revisionary ...

Interest Deduction Controversy: AO's Scrutiny Upheld, Revenue's Revision Rejected.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 17, 2024

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the revisionary powers u/s 263 regarding the allowability of deduction claimed u/s 36(1)(iii). The Assessing Officer (AO) called for information on interest expenses, loans, advances, and the accounting method followed. The Tribunal held that the AO applied their mind, verified the facts, and considered one of the possible views based on the information provided. Mere non-discussion of a query responded to by the assessee in the assessment order does not imply non-application of mind. The Tribunal concluded that the Principal Commissioner's order did not satisfy the twin conditions of being erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner's order and allowed the assessee's appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the revisionary ...

Interest Deduction Controversy: AO's Scrutiny Upheld, Revenue's Revision Rejected.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 17, 2024

You may also like:

Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

Revision u/s 263 - scope of limited scrutiny - PCIT has directed the AO to pass the assessment order afresh ignoring that when the case is selected for limited scrutiny,...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) - Insofar as, the second issue of excess allowances of deduction u/s.36 (1)(vii), the assessment order passed by the AO is...

Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

The ITAT Chandigarh dealt with a case involving revision u/s 263 on interest income from fixed deposits. The tribunal held that AO correctly allowed deduction u/s 80P,...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

Disallowance of an expenditure incurred representing the interest paid - case was selected for limited scrutiny on different issues - A.O. has not made any...

Revision u/s 263 - once the AO cannot examine any other issue except the issue as selected for limited scrutiny assessment, the PCIT can examine the only issue which was...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the revision u/s 263 of the Act regarding the allowability of deduction of interest claimed u/s 57. The Tribunal held...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - the transaction has never been examined by the assessing officer. No enquiry has been conducted relating to the alleged sum....

Validity of revision u/s 263 regarding eligibility for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on interest income from deposits with a cooperative bank was examined. It was held that...

Additions beyond the scope of limited scrutiny assessment - Conversions of Limited Scrutiny to Extensive Scrutiny - no steps has been taken to convert the limited...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Quick Updates: