Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 ...


Tax reassessment notices quashed, full disclosure rules clarified.

Case Laws     Income Tax

August 20, 2024

The High Court quashed the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 and the consequent initiation of reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the assessee. The key points are: 1) Failure to electronically upload Form 10CCB cannot lead to the conclusion that the assessee failed to make a full and true disclosure, as required for reopening assessment u/s 147. 2) For the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, the reassessment action was initiated beyond the maximum permissible period of six years u/s 149, rendering it invalid. 3) Section 80-IA(7) prior to its amendment in 2020 only required furnishing the audit report along with the return, and failure to electronically file it u/r 12 cannot be considered fatal to the claim u/s 80-IA. 4) The requirement of furnishing the audit report before the specified date u/s 44AB was introduced only in 2020, and the court left open the question of its impact post-2020. 5) Section 10B(8) has more imperative language than Section 80-IA(7) regarding furnishing declarations before the due date u/s 139(1).

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

  2. Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

  3. This judgment deals with the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act between July and September 2022, in light of the Tax Ordinance and the...

  4. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  5. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

  6. Validity of reassessment proceedings - The petitioner sought to quash an order and notice for reassessment under the UP VAT Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The...

  7. Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

  9. Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

  10. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  11. Notice issued against dissolved firm invalid; firm ceased to exist, rendering reassessment proceedings untenable. Apex Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki case mandates...

  12. Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

  13. Reassessment u/s 147 - The full and true disclosure of the assessee is not in doubt - The ‘recording of reasons’ is mechanical and robotic and the mandate u/s 147 has...

  14. Order of settlement u/s 245D(1) - full and true disclosure in application filed u/s 245C(1) - once the assessee approached settlement Commission with a certain amount,...

  15. The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates