The Appellate Tribunal found that the issue of jurisdiction to ...

Jurisdictional defect voids orders, remanded for fresh decision on Anti-Dumping Duty applicability.

Case Laws Customs

August 22, 2024

The Appellate Tribunal found that the issue of jurisdiction to initiate proceedings is fundamental and must be addressed first before examining the merits. The order lacked detailed discussion on the legal issues involved. Consequently, the matter was remanded back to the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) for a fresh decision. The key points are: the Anti-Dumping Duty (ADD) notification lacks provisions for tolerance levels regarding thickness, the test reports did not conclusively prove the imported goods' thickness was below 5.5 microns as declared, and the tolerance levels apply only for clearance into the Indian market, not for ADD levy. The Tribunal held that a defect in jurisdiction renders subsequent orders void, necessitating a remand for a comprehensive examination of the legal aspects.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Tribunal found that the issue of jurisdiction to ...

Jurisdictional defect voids orders, remanded for fresh decision on Anti-Dumping Duty applicability.

Case Laws Customs

August 22, 2024

You may also like:

Non-Levy of Anti-Dumping Duty - It is not possible to sustain the decision taken by the Central Government, contained in the Office Memorandum, not to impose anti-...

Failure to Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - import from China PR, Malaysia and Vietnam - It is not possible to sustain the decision taken by the Central Government, contained...

Levy of anti-dumping duty - imports of Styrene Butadiene Rubber originating in or exported from European Union, Korea RP and Thailand - Central Government did not issue...

Notification for Continuation of anti-dumping duty u/s 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 not issued - The decision taken by the Central Government not to impose...

Non-imposition of anti-dumping duty - intention of the govt. by keeping itself silent for a long period of time - it has to be presumed that the Central Government has...

Refund of Anti Dumping Duty - refund application filed without challenging the assessment order - it is undisputed fact by the revenue also that the ADD paid by the...

Levy of Anti Dumping Duty - likelihood of recurrence of dumping and injury in the event of expiry of duty - the designated authority should re-examine whether the...

Anti-Dumping Duty - Final levy of duty is higher than the provisional levy of duty - demand of differential duty - In an identical case, it has been decided that, in...

Levy of Anti-Dumping Duty - effective date of notifications - whether Anti-Dumping Duty can be levied during the interregnum period from 21.06.2002 to 09.12.2002, i.e.,...

Continuation of anti-dumping duty u/s 9A - The inevitable conclusion that follows from the aforesaid discussion is that the decision taken by the Central Government not...

Non-Levy of anti-dumping duty under section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act 1975 - the decision taken by the Central Government not to impose anti-dumping duty despite a...

Anti-dumping duty - sunset review - Expiry of old notification, extension of existing duty for further one year and rescinding of anti-duty notification on the...

Levy of Anti-Dumping Duty - Failure on the part of the respondent–authority to impose Anti Dumping Duty on imports of Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) from foreign...

Levy of Anti-Dumping Duty - time gap between provisional notification and final notification imposing ADD - anti-dumping duty during the interregnum between the expiry...

Refund of Anti-Dumping Duty paid - Polished Porcelain Tiles - A Notification comes into force only from the date of its publication, since Anti-Dumping duty Notification...

Quick Updates: