Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer ...


Assessing notices by Joint Officer invalid, non-compliance with rules.

Case Laws     Income Tax

August 23, 2024

Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) held invalid due to non-compliance with Section 151A and notification dated 29 March 2022. The High Court concurred with its earlier decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd., ruling that JAO lacked jurisdiction to issue such notices. Consequently, the impugned notices were declared illegal and invalid, and the petition was allowed in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to non-compliance with Section 151A - notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing...

  2. Faceless assessment notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer instead of Facessing Assessing Officer held invalid as lacking jurisdiction u/s 151A read with Central...

  3. Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment challenged due to non-compliance with Section 151A. Notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless...

  4. Notices issued u/s 148 by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) were held invalid due to lack of jurisdiction, as per Section 151A...

  5. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  6. The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

  7. Notices issued by Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) are invalid and bad-in-law u/s 151A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue...

  8. The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

  9. Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

  10. Validity of faceless assessment challenged due to notice u/s 148 issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), violating...

  11. The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

  12. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

  13. Assessment order u/s 143(3) quashed for non-issuance of show cause notice. Case transferred from faceless Assessing Officer to Jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s...

  14. The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

  15. The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates