Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, ...

Court dismisses petition challenging GST adjudication order for lack of hearing, directs filing appeal with costs.

Case Laws GST

August 23, 2024

Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 - petitioners claimed no opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice and CBIC circular. Court held petitioners' response was considered by proper officer as noted in order. Sufficiency of response cannot be subject matter of writ petition under Article 226. Though petitioners claimed violation of statutory provisions by not affording hearing, it was an afterthought as they did not file appeal within limitation period or approach Court expeditiously. Court granted leave to prefer appeal on payment of costs, subject to filing within two weeks. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Challenge to adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, ...

Court dismisses petition challenging GST adjudication order for lack of hearing, directs filing appeal with costs.

Case Laws GST

August 23, 2024

You may also like:

The High Court set aside the order canceling the petitioner's GST registration as it was issued without providing an opportunity for a personal hearing, violating...

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

Seeking reimbursement of GST amount paid by the petitioner - Interpretation of Contract Clause - After analyzing the documents and submissions, the High Court found that...

This is a case involving the cancellation of a petitioner's GST registration by the respondent authorities. The court held that Section 16(2)(c) and Rule 86B of the GST...

Interpretation of statute - word ‘or’ is used in section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017 - opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded - Relying on statutory...

Validity of assessment orders - The High court examined the timeline of events and observed that the petitioner responded to the show cause notice in January 2024....

The High Court addressed the issue of parallel proceedings initiated by both State and Central GST Authorities against the petitioner for the same assessment years. For...

The High Court expressed concerns over the Revenue's representative's contradictory statements regarding the availability of test reports issued by IRMRA during the main...

Cancellation of GST registration of the petitioner - The high court observed that, no mandatory order can be passed directing the authority to restore the GST...

Validity of assessment order and bank attachment notice - no personal hearing provided - The High court notes that the petitioner was not heard before the order issuance...

The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as...

Faceless Assessment - Non affording a reasonable opportunity to be heard through video conferencing - The court referred to Section 144B(6)(vii) and (viii) of the Income...

The petitioner sought restoration of its GST registration under the trade name 'Shri Salasar Balaji Steel'. The court directed the respondent authorities to confirm the...

Quick Updates: