Income under the head 'business and profession' would be earned ...

Proper documentation justifies business expenditure: CIT(A) order reversed on disallowing expenses due to insufficient evidence burden.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 28, 2024

Income under the head 'business and profession' would be earned by incurring relevant expenditure. While unjustified expenditure could be disallowed, there are limits to the documentation and evidence a normal business would maintain. The assessee meticulously maintained documents, deducted tax at source on payments to vendors executing turnkey projects. The CIT(A) failed to appreciate the limits on evidence a business entity would have to justify expenditure. The assessee provided detailed documents justifying the expenditure incurred. Relying on judicial precedents, the burden of proof on the assessee regarding proving expenditure u/s 37(1) has limits and cannot be mainly disallowed on the grounds adopted by the Assessing Officer. Disallowance u/s 37(1) was deleted, decided in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Income under the head 'business and profession' would be earned ...

Proper documentation justifies business expenditure: CIT(A) order reversed on disallowing expenses due to insufficient evidence burden.

Case Laws Income Tax

August 28, 2024

You may also like:

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) invoked Section 263 to revise the Assessing Officer's (AO) order, disallowing the amount paid on termination of an agreement,...

Disallowing business loss - business of trading in shares and securities - As pr AO assessee was directly involved in sham and bogus transactions of entry providers -...

Liabillity of pay service on reverse charge basis (RCM) - Business Entity or not - The collection of processing charges or a cost markup on the medicines purchased on...

Disallowance of loss on reasons of non-set up of business - company has not at all completed set up of the business so as to commercially starts its operation. In such...

The assessee, engaged in the business of shares and securities, claimed administration expenses, including Portfolio Management Service (PMS) expenses, against capital...

Reversal of CENVAT credit - Appellants have reversed only the CVD and they have not reversed the credit of SAD availed by them. - there are no force in the argument of...

Set off of business losses - The expression “any“ business clearly includes all businesses, without making any distinction between speculation and non-speculation...

Addition u/s 68 - Loan taken from shell company - There is no dispute with regard to utilization of funds in the business and applied for the business purpose. As long...

Consultancy charges paid to a director were disallowed u/s 40A(2). The assessee justified the payment, citing the director's expertise, experience, and reasonableness...

Deduction u/s 80P(2)(i)(a) - Additions u/s 68 - For a reason recorded and accepted by all the authorities, the 5% of the expenditure booked against interest paid to...

Disallowance of financial expenses in proportion to purchase from bogus companies was challenged. The assessing officer disallowed expenditure to the extent of paper...

Disallowance of interest on account of excess payment to the partners on the capital account - the approach of the AO in calculating the interest by considering only the...

Addition of aggregate of cash as well as cheque deposit in the bank account of assessee - the assessee was doing some business activity, though it was not disclosed to...

Reverse Charge Mechanism - Business Auxiliary Services - Share of profit in the joint ownership of business - revenue failed to prove that assessee was engaged in providing BAS.

Entitlement to loss on revaluation of the closing stock - a claim which is not substantiated by proper documentation cannot be allowed to the assessee - AT

Quick Updates: