The court held that u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act, a notice u/s ...

Customs seizure upheld due to timely notice served via email despite petitioner's objection.

Case Laws Customs

August 29, 2024

The court held that u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act, a notice u/s 124(a) must be issued to the owner or concerned person within six months of seizing the goods. Failing this, the seized goods must be returned. Section 153 prescribes alternative modes for serving such notice. The petitioner attempted to show non-receipt of the 04.07.2023 email by providing a mobile inbox screenshot, but this was deemed untrustworthy evidence u/s 65-B of the Evidence Act. As the show cause notice was served via email on 04.07.2023, within six months of the 21.01.2023 seizure, the petitioner is not entitled to release of the gold bars at this stage. The writ petition was dismissed for lack of merit.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The court held that u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act, a notice u/s ...

Customs seizure upheld due to timely notice served via email despite petitioner's objection.

Case Laws Customs

August 29, 2024

You may also like:

The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order where no notice u/s 148 was served on the assessee. The notice u/s 148 was issued through the ITBA portal...

Failure to service notice due to wrong email address - The assessee was not served notice due to wrong reference of email address, therefore, in our view the assessee...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - default servicing notice - notice served on the secondary email id registered with PAN - AO ought to have sent the notice u/s 148 to...

Validity of SCN - delivery of notices beyond the time limitation - the notice was served on them by hand on 03.04.2001. In such circumstances, the service of notice...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Manner of service of notice - there is no mentioning of reasons by the A.O. in the assessment order as to why the Notice has to be served through...

Levy of GST - notice pay recoveries made from the employees on account of not serving the full notice period - It may be concluded that, recovery of notice pay from dues...

Validity of reassessment proceedings - non-service of notice u/s 148A(b) through e-mail - Denial of principle of natural justice - The High Court examined the evidence...

Framing assessment u/s 143(3) without serving notices at the registered e-mail address - changing of the e-mail id - The ITAT found that the appellant had not...

Validity of Communication over Email - The petitioner claims that notices and orders from the GST authorities were not received due to being diverted to the spam folder...

Oppression and Mismanagement - removal of director for not attending three consecutive meetings - extract of meeting dated 20.5.2010 has been signed by the appellant, it...

Validity of assessment - notice of hearing was served upon minor daughter - the notice should be served at least on any adult member of the family and if the notice is...

Validity of assessment - Once the notice u/s 143(2) was not served on the assessee through proper channel, even though such notice has been served through a person, who...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Date of issuance of notice - communication in electronic form - Whether digitally signing notice would automatically amount to issuance...

Maintainability of application - Corporate Debtor - mandatory notice - notice has been sent by e-mail as well as by post but the notice sent by post has not been served...

Quick Updates: