Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale ...

Tribunal Orders New Assessment Due to Undeclared Gains and Losses in Penny Stocks; Original Assessment Lacked Proper Inquiry.

September 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale of shares of ECL and Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of Saya in the return of income. ECL and Saya appear to be penny stock companies. Assessee seemingly dealt in shares of these companies but did not reflect profits/losses correctly in the return. Assessing Officer (AO) failed to inquire into this aspect during assessment proceedings. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) erred in directing AO to assess income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE, binding AO without independent application of mind. Assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue's interest as AO did not examine treatment of LTCL and LTCG. AO directed to carry out de-novo assessment as per law after giving assessee opportunity of hearing. Decided against assessee by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale ...

Tribunal Orders New Assessment Due to Undeclared Gains and Losses in Penny Stocks; Original Assessment Lacked Proper Inquiry.

September 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - bogus capital gains from the penny stock script - AO should have made enquiry into the genuineness of the claim of exemption of capital gains...

The assessee dealt with a penny stock, and the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct proper inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The Principal Commissioner of...

The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The Tribunal held that the objection of the assessee regarding low tax effect was not sustainable. The addition made u/s 68 for bogus LTCG and unexplained cash credits...

Appellate Tribunal examined disallowance of claim for futures and options (F&O) loss by Assessing Officer (AO) based on report alleging stock brokers manipulated...

The assessee, a Foreign Portfolio Investor registered in India, entered into Forward Foreign Exchange Contracts (FCC) with HDFC Bank to safeguard against foreign...

Validity of reopening of assessment - The case involved a dispute over the deletion of addition on account of undisclosed capital gain and the validity of the assessment...

Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

Capital Gain - Transfer u/s 2(47)(v) - assessment year - AO himself has given credit for the amount of capital gains declared for the assessment year 2013-14, while...

Trading in shares - allegation of transactions in penny stock scrip - unexplained income - Assessee has not paid the purchase cost nor received the entire sale...

Validity of Assessment order as time barred - delay dispatching assessment order - The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and relevant precedents, concluded...

ITAT ruled that capital gains from shares acquired before 01/04/2017 by a Mauritius resident are exempt under India-Mauritius DTAA Article 13(3)/(4), being taxable only...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 for "non-genuine loss" on account of assessee's transactions in futures and options (F&O) was unjustified. The reasons recorded did not...

Addition u/s. 69B - penny stock - mere suspicion that the assessee has invested in alleged penny stock scrip cannot be made basis of addition u/s. 69B of the Act. In the...

Quick Updates: