Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of reopening of assessment - The case involved a ...


Reassessment Quashed: Tribunal Invalidates Tax Order Due to Improper Notice and Jurisdictional Errors in Capital Gains Case.

March 15, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of reopening of assessment - The case involved a dispute over the deletion of addition on account of undisclosed capital gain and the validity of the assessment order. The Revenue's arguments regarding undisclosed capital gain were dismissed by the Tribunal, highlighting the lack of responsibility on the assessee's part and the significance of matching amounts in documents. Furthermore, the Tribunal found the assessment order invalid due to improper notice under section 148 of the Act, emphasizing the jurisdictional requirement for proper notice and quashing the reassessment proceedings as a result.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  2. ITAT quashed notice under section 148 and subsequent proceedings initiated by ACIT Circle-1, Jaipur due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The assessee's case fell...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

  4. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - no notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued by the AO for taking case under scrutiny - The Tribunal meticulously examined...

  5. Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a re-assessment notice issued by the jurisdictional AO instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) as...

  7. ITAT quashed assessment orders under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance....

  8. The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

  9. Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - notice under section 148 has been issued by a non jurisdictional AO - It is settled principle of law that when the notice under section...

  11. Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing...

  12. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

  13. Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

  14. The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

  15. Notice issued against dissolved firm invalid; firm ceased to exist, rendering reassessment proceedings untenable. Apex Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki case mandates...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates