Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The reassessment proceedings were initiated against a ...


Reassessment notice invalid: No authority sanction & time-barred for non-resident's other income under Rs. 50 lakh.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 7, 2024

The reassessment proceedings were initiated against a non-resident individual deriving income from other sources after three years had elapsed. The sanction of the Specified Authority was not obtained as per the prevalent law. Information was received regarding possible infringement of section 56(2)(vii) related to transactions of immovable property. The Tribunal held that the sanction of the Specified Authority was mandatory and not obtained in conformity with the law. Additionally, the notice u/s 148 was time-barred as per section 149 since it was issued after three years, and the amount alleged to have escaped assessment was less than Rs. 50 lakh. Consequently, the notice issued u/s 148 was void ab initio and bad in law, and the decision was in favor of the assessee.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

  2. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Fresh sanction under Section 151 - For a moment, even if accept Revenue’s contention that the present proceedings are continuation of...

  3. The High Court held that the reassessment notice issued beyond the period of limitation was invalid and without jurisdiction. The impugned notice itself was illegal, and...

  4. Assessee, a non-resident Indian residing outside India for over 25 years, challenged the jurisdiction of Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2), Ajmer to issue notice u/s...

  5. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  6. Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

  7. Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

  9. Notice issued u/s 148 beyond the limitation period prescribed under erstwhile provisions of section 149(1)(b) is barred by limitation, even after considering the...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Time limit for notice - (TOLA) application - as the foundation of the entire reassessment proceeding, viz., the notice issued in June...

  11. The ITAT Delhi held that the notice issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer u/s 148 was invalid. The jurisdiction over the assessee was with a different...

  12. Rejection of cross objections as time barred - in the Act, no such time period is prescribed. Time fixed by the learned Appellate Authority was fixed by him and there...

  13. Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 barred by limitation - Though the notice u/s 148(2) was first published in the newspaper on 09.12.2017 which was beyond the...

  14. Sanction by specified authority not obtained as per amended provisions of Section 151 for reopening assessment beyond 3 years, rendering impugned notice invalid;...

  15. Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates