The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s ...

IT Assessment Order Disregarding Objections to DRP Quashed by High Court.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 7, 2024

The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s 144C(3) read with Section 144B. The petitioner had filed objections to the Draft Assessment Order before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). Considering the objections filed before the DRP and the observations made in the Open Silicon Research case, the court held that the Assessment Order passed disregarding the objections requires interference. The Assessing Officer (AO) ought to have waited for the DRP's directions. The court allowed the petition, setting aside the order, with a direction to the AO to follow the DRP's directions and proceed accordingly, while the DRP would issue necessary directions considering the petitioner's objections.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court ruled on the validity of an order passed u/s ...

IT Assessment Order Disregarding Objections to DRP Quashed by High Court.

Case Laws Income Tax

September 7, 2024

You may also like:

Non consideration of objections to the draft assessment order u/s 144 - since the objections were well within time, the action of the AO in proceeding with the final...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

Assessment order passed u/s 144C(2) - The assessee did not file the objections before the DRP within the prescribed time and therefore, the objections are not...

The case involves the validity of a final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144(C)(3) beyond the period of limitation. The Dispute Resolution...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - AO issued notice u/s 154 based on audit objections, adding waiver of principal amount and revising book profit. Tribunal dismissed...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - HC has quashed the entire criminal proceedings - the High Court has grossly erred in quashing the criminal proceedings by...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of...

DRP directions without a valid computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) allotted and quoted in the body of the order are invalid and deemed never issued....

Appointment of arbitrator - The order passed by the High Court to the extent directing to constitute an Arbitral Tribunal in terms of clause 64(3)(b) of the GCC is...

Validity of reopening assessment challenged due to non-disposal of objections raised by assessee against reassessment. Deduction u/s 24(a) proposed to be disallowed....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening based on audit objections - reasons to believe - High Court observed that, reopening an assessment beyond four years requires...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as AO reopened with non-application of mind and higher authorities granted approval u/s 151 mechanically without verifying...

Principles of natural justice - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's argument regarding the violation of procedural fairness, as the impugned order failed to...

Transfer pricing adjustment - selection of comparable - Tribunal specified the aspects that may be kept in mind by the DRP while addressing the objections in respect to...

Withdrawal of objection submitted before DRP - DRP has not issued any direction on merits of the proposed draft assessment order; therefore, the Assessing Officer got...

Quick Updates: