The respondent, engaged in selling medicines with GSTIN ...

GST profiteering: Pharma company failed to pass on rate cut benefit of Rs. 2.06L on skin serum.

Case Laws GST

September 7, 2024

The respondent, engaged in selling medicines with GSTIN 24AFKPG7000FIZZ, failed to pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on the product "Eclat Serum 30gm" (HSN 33049910) to the recipients, effective from 15.11.2017 as per Notification No. 41/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017. This contravened Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. The profiteered amount is determined as Rs. 2,06,100/- u/r 133(1) of the CGST Rules 2017. The respondent is required to pass on the profiteered amount of Rs. 2,06,100/- along with 18% interest from the date of collection till payment, as per Rule 133(3)(b). Although the respondent committed an offence u/s 171(3A) by denying the rate reduction benefit, penalty cannot be imposed retrospectively as Section 171(3A) was inserted effective 01.01.2020.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The respondent, engaged in selling medicines with GSTIN ...

GST profiteering: Pharma company failed to pass on rate cut benefit of Rs. 2.06L on skin serum.

Case Laws GST

September 7, 2024

You may also like:

Respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema ticket prices above Rs. 100 during 01.01.2019 to...

Profiteering - restaurant service - reduction in rate of GST - every recipient/ customer is entitled to the benefit of the tax rate reduction by way of reduced prices...

Respondent resorted to profiteering by not reducing selling price commensurately despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on cinema tickets above Rs. 100, from...

Profiteering established by increasing base prices of movie tickets despite GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% for admission tickets above Rs. 100, contravening Section...

Profiteering - supply of "ECLAT SERUM" - allegation is that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate by the way of commensurate reduction in...

Profiteering - purchase of fiats - it is alleged that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on to the Applicant No. 1 and Applicant No, 2 by way of...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The Authority takes cognizance, based on the DGAP’s verification, that the Respondent No. 2 has passed on benefit as per Table-N above...

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

Profiteering - Respondent had increased the price of the flat after the introduction of GST - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed on - the Respondent has...

Profiteering - supply of Dettol HW Liquid Original 900 ml - allegation that respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the GST rate from 28% to 18% and...

Profiteering - supply of “Snacks” - benefit of reduction in the rate of tax not passed on - Profiteering proceedings are only concerned with ascertaining whether the...

Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - benefit of reduction in the GST rate not passed on - the Respondent is...

Profiteering - base prices of 1383 goods had been increased by the Respondents after the rate of tax was reduced - allegation that the Respondents had not passed on the...

Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

Quick Updates: