Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of ...

Order upholding quashing of penalty for goods transport upheld. Seizure allowed only if documents not genuine under Act. Documents genuine.

Case Laws GST

July 23, 2024

Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of goods upheld. Power of detention or seizure can only be exercised when goods lack genuine documents under Act. Genuineness of documents not disputed. Allegation that prescribed documents not produced unsupported. Once accompanying documents found genuine, goods should not have been seized. Impugned order dated 06.03.2024 quashed, petition allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of ...

Order upholding quashing of penalty for goods transport upheld. Seizure allowed only if documents not genuine under Act. Documents genuine.

Case Laws GST

July 23, 2024

You may also like:

Power of Judicial Review - challenge the order of Settlement Commission - majority order versus minority order - The opinion of the majority quashed and the minority...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) addressed the issue of classifying imported goods as worn clothing under Customs Tariff Item No. 6309 90...

CESTAT New Delhi held that an aircraft used for transporting persons for remuneration falls under public transport, not private use. Referring to M/s.V.R.L. Logistics,...

The imported goods, HDPE Regrind, were classified under Customs Tariff Item (CTH) 3901 2000. The issue was whether the goods were permissible for importation into the...

Container storage charges - The High Court upheld the decision of the single judge, stating that since the goods were indeed confiscated by customs authorities while in...

Maintainability of appeal against order under CGST/SGST Act adjudication on refund application dismissed. Appellant had option to pay amounts demanded or contest seizure...

The High Court addressed the validity of a seizure order u/s 67(2) of the CGST Act, focusing on whether the term "things" includes cash/currency seized during search and...

Validity of detention and seizure of goods - classification of scrap - The DRI has firstly detained the goods, which later on had been seized. Assuming that the stage of...

Import of old and used tyres - confiscation and again ordering re-export of confiscated goods is contrary to each other - confiscation of goods upheld with imposition of...

Quick Updates: