Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of ...

Order upholding quashing of penalty for goods transport upheld. Seizure allowed only if documents not genuine under Act. Documents genuine.

Case Laws GST

July 23, 2024

Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of goods upheld. Power of detention or seizure can only be exercised when goods lack genuine documents under Act. Genuineness of documents not disputed. Allegation that prescribed documents not produced unsupported. Once accompanying documents found genuine, goods should not have been seized. Impugned order dated 06.03.2024 quashed, petition allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Impugned order quashing levy of penalty for transportation of ...

Order upholding quashing of penalty for goods transport upheld. Seizure allowed only if documents not genuine under Act. Documents genuine.

Case Laws GST

July 23, 2024

You may also like:

Non-generation of e-way bill during transportation of goods led to seizure order u/s 129(3) of GST Act, imposing penalty and interest. However, it was admitted that...

Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State E-way Bill was challenged. The Court held that at the time of interception, the Central E-way Bill under GST...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Power of Judicial Review - challenge the order of Settlement Commission - majority order versus minority order - The opinion of the majority quashed and the minority...

Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

Levy of Personal Penalty on the Director of the company and Drivers of the trucks (transporters) - Penalties u/r 26 of CER - Abetment - Clandestine removal - gutka - The...

The CESTAT upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on inputs used for laying foundations or making support structures for capital goods, as per the revised definition of...

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

CESTAT New Delhi held that an aircraft used for transporting persons for remuneration falls under public transport, not private use. Referring to M/s.V.R.L. Logistics,...

The High Court addressed the validity of a seizure order u/s 67(2) of the CGST Act, focusing on whether the term "things" includes cash/currency seized during search and...

Validity of detention and seizure of goods - classification of scrap - The DRI has firstly detained the goods, which later on had been seized. Assuming that the stage of...

Maintainability of appeal against order under CGST/SGST Act adjudication on refund application dismissed. Appellant had option to pay amounts demanded or contest seizure...

Quick Updates: