Writ petition challenging impugned order dated 25.11.2022 for ...

Petitioner prevails as tax authority's order quashed for lack of due process and improper jurisdiction.

Case Laws Service Tax

September 20, 2024

Writ petition challenging impugned order dated 25.11.2022 for violation of principles of natural justice and lack of territorial jurisdiction. Court held that service of show cause notice was defective as it was not sent to petitioner's proper address, violating Section 37C(1)(a) of the Act. Resorting to Section 37C(1)(b)&(c) without complying with (a) is impermissible. Impugned order passed without affording due opportunity, violating Article 14 and 21. On territorial jurisdiction, petitioner not registered under Finance Act 1994, and registration under CGST Act 2017 irrelevant. Jurisdictional issue to be decided by respondent if fresh show cause notice issued at proper address. Impugned order quashed for violation of natural justice. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Writ petition challenging impugned order dated 25.11.2022 for ...

Petitioner prevails as tax authority's order quashed for lack of due process and improper jurisdiction.

Case Laws Service Tax

September 20, 2024

You may also like:

Jurisdiction to issue SCN - Ocean Freight - contention of the petitioner is to the effect that, what has been sought to be invoked the Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated...

The provisions of the IBC 2016 would prevail over the Income Tax Act 1961. Income Tax authorities have limited jurisdiction to assess/determine the quantum of Income Tax...

A Non-Resident Indian residing in Saudi Arabia made fixed deposits from remittances received in Dubai and maturity proceeds of existing term deposits, interest on NRE...

The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no...

The respondent failed to process the petitioner's application for cancellation of GST registration, citing reasons such as the requirement to pay due tax and penalties,...

Validity of issuance of SCN - Demand of service tax - Post GST era - It is ordered that the petitioner Company may give their detailed written submissions/written...

The ITAT Mumbai dismissed the assessee's appeal as not maintainable due to pending liquidation process. Penalty u/s 271 imposed for failure to audit accounts u/s 44AB....

The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

Debts due to secured creditors under SARFAESI Act have priority over debts under FEMA. SARFAESI Act being a later enactment prevails over earlier FEMA. SARFAESI Act...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

Non-payment of GST - recovery of tax alongwith interest and penalty - Jurisdiction - Even if we accept the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that...

Territorial Jurisdiction - proper officer or not - Registration was assigned to Central GST Officer - SCN was issued by the State GST officer - the distribution of work...

The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

Declaration of bodies corporate, their promoters and directors, as “wilful defaulters” - Lack of transparency and due process in the Union Bank's procedure for declaring...

Principles of natural justice - validity of adjudication order - Exercising a jurisdiction in an irregular manner by an authority is different from exercising a...

Quick Updates: