The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that it would not ...

Petition Dismissed: Court Awaits Appellate Decision; IGST Payment Already Made, Recovery Actions Halted Pending Appeal.

September 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that it would not be appropriate to interfere in the matter during the pendency of the appeal before the appellate authority. The petitioner was granted the liberty to raise all submissions before the appellate authority, which would undoubtedly consider and pass appropriate orders. The Division Bench had protected the petitioner from recovery proceedings on the ground that the entire IGST amount had already been paid. According to Section 77 of the GST Act, if a registered person has paid Central or State Tax and is subsequently held liable for Inter-State GST, the wrongly deposited amount would be refunded, allowing payment as per the authorities' determination. This aspect can be duly verified by the first appellate authority.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that it would not ...

Petition Dismissed: Court Awaits Appellate Decision; IGST Payment Already Made, Recovery Actions Halted Pending Appeal.

September 20, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the levy of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on ocean freight paid by the petitioner was unconstitutional. The Court relied on the...

Prohibitory order - Order prohibiting creditors to make payment - Recovery of tax u/s 220(1) - HC

Circular provides guidelines for recovery of outstanding dues when first appeal is disposed of before Appellate Tribunal becomes operational. Taxpayers unable to file...

The taxable event for levy of IGST is the inter-state supply of goods and services, including supply in the course of importation. The charging section for collection of...

Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially,...

TDS u/s 195 - use of logo - license fee payment without deducting TDS SUPIMA, USA - Agreement clearly shows that the payment is made by the assessee to use the Logo of...

Petitioner paid IGST but respondent did not take benefit of ITC. Dispute not settled. Appellate authority to consider grievance regarding payment of penalty and interest...

HC found no violation of natural justice principles in the appellate proceedings. The authority had fully complied with Section 107(9) by granting the petitioner...

Petition challenging SCN demanding IGST paid on manpower supply services received by petitioner. Court held State GST Authorities had already initiated proceedings...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition seeking a writ of prohibition despite the petitioner not challenging the allegedly erroneous orders. The...

Refund of IGST on Export of Goods - Conditions were complied with post-export - Amendment of Bills of Entry for imported goods under the Advanced Authorisation Scheme...

Refund of IGST - There is a direct binding decision of this Court, which is rendered in favour of the assessee holding the assessee entitled to the refund of IGST....

Latest GST Notifications (CGST Rate and IGST Rate) to give effect to gst council decisions

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment...

The HC held that an officer appointed under Section 6 of the Karnataka GST Act qualifies as a proper officer under Section 4 of the IGST Act through cross-empowerment...

Quick Updates: