Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the assessee firm was not entitled to ...


Firm denied tax deduction on compensation paid for properties it had no rights over.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 25, 2024

The High Court held that the assessee firm was not entitled to claim deduction u/s 37(1) of the Income Tax Act for the compensation paid. The key points are: The properties involved in the agreement did not belong to the assessee firm during the relevant assessment year. The assessee did not have any right, title or interest in those properties. The assessee was not a party to the agreements related to those properties. The Tribunal's reasoning that the assessee had acquired interest or rights in the properties by virtue of registration or identification was erroneous. The assessee failed to substantiate that the liability for compensation was crystallized or provided for during the relevant year. The Tribunal erred in allowing the assessee's claim by setting aside the concurrent findings of the lower authorities.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Deduction u/s 54/54F - assessee has not acquired the ownership rights in the new property but merely acquired tenancy right which could not be equated with ownership...

  2. Income from house property - deductions claimed u/s 24(a) - society charges - If, the amount paid to society charges includes municipal taxes levied by the local...

  3. TDS u/s 194LA - compensation amount paid on account of acquisition of land - High Court concluded that, after looking at from any angle, as long as the award is made...

  4. Exemption on property tax paid on immovable property - Notification

  5. Partnership firm rendered professional services in Japan, taxes withheld there. Firm claimed foreign tax credit (FTC) which was denied by tax authorities. ITAT held that...

  6. Deduction u/s 35DDA - Retrenchment compensation paid on the closure of the assessee's manufacturing unit in Kalamassery - one unit out of three closed down - claim of...

  7. Transfer of goodwill to partners - reconstruction of firm - the partnership firm did not cease to hold the property - its right to the property is not extinguished - no...

  8. CENVAT Credit - input services - Irrespective of the person whether it is service recipient or service provider is liable to pay the service tax but so long the service...

  9. Compensation received for foregoing the rights to sue against purchase of property - revenue or capital receipt - Once the compensation is held to be is only on account...

  10. The assessee claimed exemption/deduction u/s 54F on account of investing long-term capital gains in a new residential house. The PCIT disallowed the claim, considering...

  11. MAT - deduction of Rebate u/s 88E while calculating the tax liability of the assessee for minimum alternative tax u/s 115JB - when the total income is assessed and the...

  12. Capital gain in respect of sale of only one property - addition u/s 50C - assessee itself had leasehold rights in the said property and hence in instant facts, the...

  13. Renting of immovable property service - Liability of Appellant (Partnership Firm) is liable to discharge service tax on property jointly owned by parents of the...

  14. Compensation received on surrender of tenancy rights - Taxability in the hands or in the hands of Firm - who is the owner of tenancy right - Payment of rent by Firm and...

  15. Allowable business expenditure - compensation paid by the assessee for the closure of agreement - as per AO company to whom the compensation has been paid did not have...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates