The High Court directed respondents to expeditiously establish ...

GST Appellate Tribunal for Kerala must be set up within 4 months, as per High Court directive on Section 112 of CGST Act.

September 30, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court directed respondents to expeditiously establish the GST Appellate Tribunal in Kerala as per Section 112 of the CGST Act 2017. While noting steps were underway, it ordered completion of the entire selection process within four months. The Court declined to rectify Section 169 by replacing "or" with "and" to mandate service through minimum three modes, stating individual grievances must be raised through separate litigation. The writ petition was disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court directed respondents to expeditiously establish ...

GST Appellate Tribunal for Kerala must be set up within 4 months, as per High Court directive on Section 112 of CGST Act.

September 30, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22 of CGST Rules 2017 allows revocation of GST registration cancellation u/s 29(2)(c) of CGST Act 2017 if pending returns are filed and...

HC set aside GST registration cancellation order issued u/s 29(2)(c) of CGST Act 2017 for non-filing of returns for six continuous months. Following precedents from...

HC held that appellate authority lacks inherent power to condone delay beyond statutory limits under CGST Act Section 107. Appeals must be filed within three months of...

Conduct of lotteries - Power of Host State to make rules under section 12 of the Act to monitor the conduct of lotteries of Organising States within the territory of the...

Rates of Tax on Goods - Schedule 4 - IGST @ 28% - CGST @ 14% - SGST / UTGST @ 14% - GST

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

The High Court examined the validity of Notification No. 56/2023-CT dated 28.12.2023, which extended the time limit for passing orders u/s 73 of the Central Goods and...

HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

The respondent resorted to profiteering by not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cinema tickets, realizing an additional Rs. 4,65,549 from recipients. As...

HC quashed order relating to Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims that were time-barred under Section 16(4) of CGST Act but fell within limitation under Section 16(5)....

The HC dismissed a petition challenging the Appellate Authority's refusal to condone a 95-day delay in filing a GST appeal. Under Section 107(1) of GST law, appeals must...

Entitlement for interest on refund - finalizing the assessment after delay of 8 years - The appellant is entitled to interest if the refund is payable after the expiry...

Appellant entitled to refund of Service Tax paid on input services used for manufacturing exported cut and polished diamonds prior to GST regime as per Rule 5 of CENVAT...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Assessment of turnover of the applicant as per Section 4(3) of the VAT - levy of tax on turnover of sale has to be done in the manner provided in Section 4(3) of the Act...

Quick Updates: