The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and ...

High Court Remands Case for Fresh Review, Clarifies Jurisdiction Despite Appeal Dismissed Due to Time Limitation.

October 3, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed on the ground of time limitation. However, the Court held that if an appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay as barred by limitation, it is not considered an appeal in the eyes of law, and there would be no merger of the original order into the order of the Appellate Authority. Therefore, the High Court can exercise its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The mere dismissal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority on the ground of limitation does not preclude the High Court from exercising its jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and ...

High Court Remands Case for Fresh Review, Clarifies Jurisdiction Despite Appeal Dismissed Due to Time Limitation.

October 3, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC dismissed the review petition against its order that had remitted the case for fresh assessment. The court found no grounds for review as the original order was based...

Condonation of delay in filing of Review Application - In view of the fact that Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to the Court / Tribunal whether the...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Validity of initiation of review proceedings - It is a trite law that an order, which is bad from its inception itself, cannot be cured by subsequent action. In the...

The case involved denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of return. The department argued return must be filed u/s 139(1) to claim exemption u/s 11. An amendment...

Jurisdiction - power of Tribunal to review its own order - Power of Review has to be granted by statute and the ‘power of Review’ is not an inherent power and therefore...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The circular clarifies that u/s 4.17 of Hand Book of Procedures-2023, AA holders can seek review of Norm's Committee decisions made before 01.04.2023 until 31.12.2024...

The circular clarifies the time of supply for GST payment on spectrum allocation services when telecom operators opt for deferred payments. The bidder is liable to pay...

Power to review of the refund order - Period of limitation - there are no merits in the contentions of the appellant (revenue) that the review could not be completed...

Delay in filing the appeal u/s 260A - condonation of delay of 79 days - exclusion of certain period while computing period of limitation - the time spent by the...

Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Quick Updates: