The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and ...

Appeal dismissed due to delay doesn't bar High Court jurisdiction to review original order.

Case Laws GST

October 3, 2024

The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and remitted the matter back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The appeal was dismissed on the ground of time limitation. However, the Court held that if an appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay as barred by limitation, it is not considered an appeal in the eyes of law, and there would be no merger of the original order into the order of the Appellate Authority. Therefore, the High Court can exercise its jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. The mere dismissal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority on the ground of limitation does not preclude the High Court from exercising its jurisdiction. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court set aside the impugned order of adjudication and ...

Appeal dismissed due to delay doesn't bar High Court jurisdiction to review original order.

Case Laws GST

October 3, 2024

You may also like:

Condonation of delay in filling appeal before ITAT - delay of 384 days - The assessee's delay in filing appeals, ranging from 383 to 384 days, was not condoned due to...

Validity of review order - Period of limitation - It cannot be understood what prevented the Department from submitting before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the...

The appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation, and the doctrine of merger does not apply when an appeal is dismissed due to limitation. The merits were not examined...

Delay in filling appeal before ITAT - Delay of 68 days involved in filing of the appeal - The Tribunal noted the substantial delay in filing the appeal and the absence...

Maintainability of appeal - appeal dismissed on the ground of time limitation - non-submission of the certified copy. - Despite discrepancies raised by the respondent...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The appellant withdrew the appeal knowingly that the remedy of appeal is available despite that a review petition was filed...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The Commissioner (Appeals) can only condone the delay in filing an appeal if the same is barred by one month and the Commissioner...

Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

The ITAT Gauhati Bench jurisdiction issue was raised concerning an appeal filed under improper jurisdiction. The assessee's address was consistently in Kolkata, with no...

Condonation of delay in filing the present appeal by 1241 days - reasons for delay - Once the appeal has been dismissed ex-parte by the ld CIT(A) due to non-prosecution...

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal and non-payment of fee towards filing of appeal - delay of 920 days - The case revolved around an appeal filed against a ruling...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - sufficient cause for condoning the delay or not - The petitioner contended that despite the delay, their case had merit,...

Condonation of delay - substantial delay of 166 days before ITAT - The appellant argued that the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT was due to the absence of...

Condonation of delay in re-filing appeals by revenue rejected - Delay of three years - Delays by government departments due to impersonal official machinery not accepted...

The High Court considered the maintainability of an appeal u/s the GST Act. The appeal was dismissed due to a 152-day delay in filing. The court clarified that the...

Quick Updates: